
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Controversial Wisc. Climate Bill Assumes Feds Will Tax Carbon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://maciverinstitute.com/2010/02/controversial-wisc-climate-bill-assumes-feds-will-tax-carbon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://maciverinstitute.com/2010/02/controversial-wisc-climate-bill-assumes-feds-will-tax-carbon/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:31:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cap and Trade Dead?&#160;&#124;&#160;MacIver News Service</title>
		<link>http://maciverinstitute.com/2010/02/controversial-wisc-climate-bill-assumes-feds-will-tax-carbon/comment-page-1/#comment-557</link>
		<dc:creator>Cap and Trade Dead?&#160;&#124;&#160;MacIver News Service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maciverinstitute.com/?p=609#comment-557</guid>
		<description>[...] As reported earlier, the Wisconsin Global Warming Bill, dubbed the Clean Energy Jobs Act by its supporters, assumes that the price of carbon-based energy will increase due to the establishment of a &#8216;cap and trade&#8217; system for carbon emissions. Our February 5th report included warnings, however, that a federal &#8216;cap and trade&#8217; system was not certain to come about. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As reported earlier, the Wisconsin Global Warming Bill, dubbed the Clean Energy Jobs Act by its supporters, assumes that the price of carbon-based energy will increase due to the establishment of a &#8216;cap and trade&#8217; system for carbon emissions. Our February 5th report included warnings, however, that a federal &#8216;cap and trade&#8217; system was not certain to come about. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Controversial Wisc. Climate Bill Assumes Feds Will Tax Carbon</title>
		<link>http://maciverinstitute.com/2010/02/controversial-wisc-climate-bill-assumes-feds-will-tax-carbon/comment-page-1/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>Controversial Wisc. Climate Bill Assumes Feds Will Tax Carbon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maciverinstitute.com/?p=609#comment-156</guid>
		<description>[...] Link to Article [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Link to Article [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
