<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New State Program Hits Roadblock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://maciverinstitute.com/2010/02/new-state-program-hits-roadblock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://maciverinstitute.com/2010/02/new-state-program-hits-roadblock/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:18:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: madtowngal</title>
		<link>http://maciverinstitute.com/2010/02/new-state-program-hits-roadblock/comment-page-1/#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator>madtowngal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maciverinstitute.com/?p=768#comment-541</guid>
		<description>where is the actuarial study for how many this new program will serve and what it will cost?  all new programs should be required to have an independent actuarial analysis on the cost of the program otherwise it shoudl not be approved, the BC+ for childless adults was purposely under budgeted as it&#039;s easier to get more money than to ask for it up front.  If the up front costs had been known, I doubt it would have made it through even a democratic legislature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where is the actuarial study for how many this new program will serve and what it will cost?  all new programs should be required to have an independent actuarial analysis on the cost of the program otherwise it shoudl not be approved, the BC+ for childless adults was purposely under budgeted as it&#8217;s easier to get more money than to ask for it up front.  If the up front costs had been known, I doubt it would have made it through even a democratic legislature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

