Posts Tagged ‘Free Speech’

On Ayers and the Occupiers

By James Wigderson
Special Guest Perspective for the MacIver Institute

Elisabeth Kubler-Ross wrote, “There are no mistakes, no coincidences. All events are blessings given to us to learn from.” In a moment of synchronicity, former Weather Underground leader Bill Ayers visited Milwaukee on Saturday just as the “Occupy Wall Street” protests gained a local shadow, “Occupy Milwaukee.”

So much of the current activism on the political left is nostalgia for the 1960s without remembering what really happened. Ayers and others helped organize the Chicago “Days of Rage,” and later the group engaged in a bombing campaign in an attempt to overthrow society. His wife Bernadine Dohrn (formerly of Whitefish Bay) was a fellow radical that bombed the Capitol. Ayers’ Weather Underground was also responsible for bombing the Pentagon and a New York police station.

Second thoughts may have begun when a few of Ayers’ comrades in the revolution blew themselves up attempting to manufacture a nail bomb. By then Ayers and his comrades had declared war on “Amerika” (it wasn’t until later radicals used three k’s) and went “underground.”

Despite most of the charges getting dropped in 1973 because of the surveillance methods used by the government, Ayers did not turn himself in until December 3, 1980. Soon Ayers was, in his words, “Guilty as hell, free as a bird—America is a great country.”

Ayers and his fellow radicals began their long marches through the institutions that they wanted to overthrow. Back in the upscale Chicago neighborhood so contrary to his radical posing, Ayers eventually found a home, of course, in the education establishment teaching at the University of Illinois at Chicago. It’s in those circles that he became friends with a community organizer, future President Barack Obama.

Obama was elected president promising “hope and change;” a program of a radical departure from the previous administration’s foreign and economic policies; and, a complete remaking of the health care economy in the United States.

After a failed stimulus program, a Wall Street bailout that Obama supported, bailouts for General Motors and Chrysler, a teacher “bailout,” and a reluctant continuing of the War on Terror (including keeping the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay), things have not worked out as well as the political left had hoped. We still have rampant unemployment, the new federal takeover of health care is unpopular and under attack as unconstitutional, and the promised new, “green economy” looks suspiciously like the same old crony capitalism.

A new political force on the right has formed, the Tea Party movement, which is united in its quest for a less expansive, less expensive government. The elections of 2010 were a disaster for Democrats. Democrats reacted with rage at the election results in Wisconsin when they lost both chambers of the legislature and the governor’s mansion. Adding to the injury was the loss by their beloved Senator Russ Feingold to businessman Ron Johnson.

The Icon was defeated by a plastics manufacturer, for crying out loud.

The political left was already looking for an excuse to launch a recall effort against Walker (Yes, there were cries for his recall on the morning of his Inauguration) and they found a cause around which they could rally in the collective bargaining issue. Organized labor has made Wisconsin the last stand, and has even been funding dead-end protesters in the Capitol long after the spotlight has faded and Walker’s reforms are beginning to work.

Now it’s time for another round of labor-supported protests and the “Occupy” movement comes to Wisconsin. They can’t protest against the establishment because the establishment belongs to them now. They can’t protest against President Obama because he’s one of them. They protest against “the war,” almost absent-mindedly forgetting who is running it. (By the way, we just sent troops to central Africa to intervene in another civil war.)

The economy is bad, so the “Occupy” movement protests against “Wall Street” and the “banks” even though Obama receives more money from Wall Street than anyone else and supported TARP.

That leaves the self-indulgent demands. One Wisconsin Now, usually more obsessed with the scatological, had a banner at the march complaining about the high cost of student loans. No word on when they will protest at the University of Wisconsin – Green Bay against the retirement and re-hiring of Vice Chancellor Tom Maki, or for that matter other wasteful spending and abuse in the UW System driving up tuition costs.

Never mind that these supposed adults were making a calculated risk when they signed themselves up for such debt with an expected payoff after graduation. They want their debts to be erased by the very banks that Obama supported bailing out when they made risky loans to people in part because of prodding by the government in the first place.

Shakespeare’s rebel Jack Cade in Henry VI would have fit in well with these protesters when he promised, “I charge and command that, of the city’s cost, the pissing-conduit run nothing but claret wine this first year of our reign.”

Unfortunately as the protesters demonstrate against “capitalism” and for forgiven college debt, they’re showing that they need not so much as college loan forgiveness, but refunds for their failed educations. They believe, as Robert Heinlein once wrote, that if they pray hard enough they can make water run uphill. “How hard? Hard enough to run uphill, of course.”

And so they demand to forget how we got to this point, the continued 9% unemployment and more foreign wars. They’ll avoid any mention of their own personal responsibility for their economic situations while scapegoating “Wall Street.”

It’s fitting Bill Ayers brought his hate America shtick to town this weekend. (Note that’s America with a ‘c’ now–he’s a cleaned up academic now) The left in Wisconsin has a lot in common with Ayers and others who practice terrorism.

You need to be vigilant in opposition to them, no matter how often they fail. They can fail again and again and again (Kloppenburg, court challenges, senate recalls), but only need to succeed once to have incredible impact.

The Occupiers are engaging in a difficult gamble. It takes a whitewash of the memory to blame so many other people and institutions when the fault lies in themselves and the president they continue to support. No wonder Bill Ayers was an attraction Saturday night for the education establishment. He’s no longer a terrorist. That’s forgotten, too.

Good thing there were protesters at Ayers’ event to remind the attendees of the unrepentant terrorist’s past transgressions. The protesters of Ayers’ appearance were far more representative of the 99% of Americans than those “occupying” Zeidler Park.

Grothman: Stop punishing business for the political donations of their employees

Senator  Calls for Ending the Requirement that Campaign Contributors Disclose Their Employers

MacIver News Service | September 29, 2011

[Madison, Wisc...] State Senator Glenn Grothman says he’s had it with the political intimidation of the left-wing, union activists in Wisconsin.

Grothman (R-West Bend) wants to end  the requirement that campaign contributors disclose their employer if they contribute in excess of $100 to a candidate for public office. He believes the current law leaves employers vulnerable to protests, boycotts and other acts of retribution for the political activity and free exercise of speech engaged by their employees.

Sen. Grothman

“As bad as it is, the desire of top level union bosses and elected politicians to destroy Wisconsin businesses who employ Republicans is only part of what offends me,” said Grothman. “Even if we didn’t have unemployment in this state, would we really want to live in a Cuban/Soviet-style environment where the government employees try to punish anyone who has a political view outside the politically correct flavor of the day?”

Originally, Grothman said, the campaign finance disclosure practice was designed to provide information regarding the type of people supporting different candidates. Now, he asserts, it merely creates a ‘to do list’ for those who exercise in economic intimidation.

“It is apparent that we will have to take this step in putting forth this legislation for the same reason we have a secret ballot when we vote,” added Grothman. “There are some narrow-minded and mean-spirited members of Wisconsin’s Totalitarian Left that will do all they can to destroy those who disagree with them.”

Grothman notes that this year  the Wisconsin Professional Police Association, the Wisconsin Firefighters Association and a variety of local teachers’ unions, have tried to use the massive purchasing power of public workers to harass and boycott Wisconsin businesses that hire Republican employee.

He says the practice became even more troublesome this month when high-ranking State Senator Lena Taylor (D-Milwaukee) aggressively opposed Georgia-Pacific and encouraging a boycott of their products.

According to the company’s website, Georgia-Pacific (GP) employs about 2,300 people in Green Bay, Neenah, Oshkosh, Phillips, and Sheboygan.. Approximately 1,800 employees work at one of four manufacturing facilities and produce and distribute an array of commercial and retail brands of bath tissue, napkins, towels and other paper products.

The Senator’s boycott campaign could have far-reaching impact. Taylor is a prominent Wisconsin Democrat who makes frequent speeches across the country and has more than 7,500 friends on the popular social networking site and many of her online friends piled on with supportive comments to her post.

Despite Grothman’s earlier pleas, Senate Minority Leader Mark Miller (D-Madison) has yet to admonish Senator Taylor and continues to keep her on the budget-writing Joint Finance Committee, widely regarded as the most powerful legislative committee in the nation.

The Time is Now to Reform Labor Laws Which Threaten Our State’s Future

By Brian Fraley
A MacIver Institute Perspective

The next 60 days should bring a sea change to Wisconsin’s anti-job creation, anti-innovation labor laws.

And it would not be a moment to soon.

In January a new Governor and Legislature will take office facing a state deficit as high as $3 Billion.  The current Governor and Legislature increased Wisconsin taxes-primarily on businesses and investors-to the tune of $2 billion. We provided more details about this disaster in our $13 Billion of Bad missive.  Such a burdensome tax load cannot be sustained.

Two simple but fundamental steps to kick start the Wisconsin economy and get our state budget mess resolved would be to repeal collective bargaining for public employees and to make Wisconsin a right to work state, giving private sector workers the choice of whether they want to pay union dues in their workplace.

Taxpayer advocates should champion both causes and praise and assist those who work to advance them.

Repealing collective bargaining rights for government unions may seem a tall order, but not when you consider history.  The concept of collective bargaining by public employee unions is not some century-old part of Wisconsin’s foundation. We became a state in 1848.  The State of Wisconsin did not enact a collective bargaining law until 1959, led by then-Governor and later liberal U.S. Senator Gaylord Nelson.

Nelson’s efforts fifty years ago made Wisconsin the first state in the nation to pass such sweeping legislation governing public sector labor relations and followed the lead of New York City.

One of the very first politicians to muscle through collective bargaining for public employees was New York’s Mayor Robert Wagner who did so in 1958, a move seen by many at the time as a political trade off to ensure his re-election.  In 1962, President John F. Kennedy followed suit, allowing, for the first time, collective bargaining by employees of the Federal government.

Since those moves in the middle of the 20th Century, the cost and scope of government in the United States has grown exponentially. Government employs more, attempts to do more, involves itself more and more into previously private matters and consumes larger and larger amounts of private sector wealth to fuel this binge. This growth is fueled by the influence of public employee unions, who gain their power through taxpayer paid union dues, which in turn are used to leverage policies that lead to the increase in the size, scope and cost of government, which means more public employee union members, which means more union dues and the cycle continues.

The result?

We now have more government jobs than manufacturing jobs in Wisconsin.

We used to be a state where we make things. Now we are a state that makes excuses for why the government behemoth cannot be tamed.

That must change.

In recent decades the strength of organized labor has shifted from the private sector manufacturing and service sectors to governmental workers’ unions like AFSCME and teachers unions like AFT and WEAC.  While this shift has occurred, the role of union funding in state and national elections has continued to grow, often making unions and trial lawyers the principal funders of  campaigns from the president right on down to legislative races.

Herein lies the problem with public employee unions: They determine the fate of their own bosses who in turn have dominion over their compensation. Public employee unions skew the labor-management equation through their political muscle and the fact that their contracts are approved by the very same politicians for whom they vote. Therefore, they have the power to perpetuate and accentuate their own wage and benefit structures at the expense of the taxpaying public.

Building painters in school districts with annual compensation packages of more than $98,000 and bus drivers making six figure salaries that translate into benefit-rich pensions are part of the driving force in the budget problems facing Wisconsin.

Unfunded and underfunded pension and retiree health care liabilities are ticking time bombs at every level of government.

Wisconsin’s state budget doubles the trouble. As a matter of public policy Wisconsin lawmakers have chosen to fund a great deal of local governments’ and schools’ budgets as a means of controlling property taxes. Yet, as school boards and local government employers lack the tools and the will to control wages and benefits, these expenses skyrocket.

If step one in the road to Wisconsin’s fiscal recovery is for government, as the employer, to be able to take back control of employee compensation by getting rid of public sector collective bargaining then step two is for Wisconsin to become a right-to-work state.

Federal law allows states the option to adopt right-to-work laws, which means that employees who go to work for a company that has a union can choose not to become a member of that union and to pay those union dues. Twenty two states are currently right-to-work states, and Missouri and Indiana are seriously considering right-to-work laws.

States without right-to-work laws permit the coerced payment of union dues. Whether you want a union or not, you are going to pay union dues, and even have those dues go to the support of candidates that you oppose, in non right-to-work states. More and more, younger workers want choice in their work environment, and they want the merit of their work to matter.  By rewarding time in service over competency, unions take advantage of those just entering the workforce, they stifle employee choice, and they ignore merit for all workers through convoluted work rules and seniority systems in the workplace.

Private sector labor unions occupy a unique place in American law and society.  They are the only entities, by law, that are exempted from anti-monopoly laws, that are given the power of coerced representation, and that receive millions of dollars from the Federal government in direct grants, and billions to state entities with heavy union representation that provide worker training.

The only counter balance to all of this is in those states that at least give workers a choice whether or not to support the union in their workplace with union dues from their hard earned wages. Again, this isn’t some crazy, untried concept. Nearly half of the states recognize this form of workers’ rights–and they continue to grow their economies and outperform those states that have not adopted right-to-work laws.

Coming off the heels of the most irresponsible, pro-labor union legislative sessions in my lifetime, it’s time for bold moves in Madison. This isn’t about payback, or leveling the playing field. No less than the financial solvency of our state and local governments may depend on these two measures.

The new Governor and Legislature can unleash Wisconsin’s private sector employers and their workers from forced unionism by adopting a right-to-work law, allowing workers the choice to become part of a union, or not.

The alternative is to continue to operate Wisconsin’s state government the way we have for the last several decades and expect different outcomes on the balance sheet.

The end of public sector collective bargaining, and the adoption of the right to work in the private sector are the kinds of fundamental change that will get Wisconsin’s state budget and her economy back on track.

California may be the worst example of a state adrift, but it is not alone.

Wisconsin is on the verge of fiscal insolvency.  Tinkering won’t suffice.


Christopher Horner to Speak in Milwaukee Tonight

MacIver News Service | November 17, 2010

[Milwaukee, Wisc…] Students at Marqutte University will  have the opportunity to hear a skeptic’s take on the issue of global warming tonight.

Christopher Horner, senior fellow with the Competitive Enterprise Institute in Washington, D.C., will give a presentation sponsored by the Marquette University College Republicans.

“The College Republicans wanted to bring a differing voice to campus,” said Marquette University student Ethan Hollenberger, who noted that last month the MU Student Government speaker series hosted “the No Impact Man” Colin Beaven, a radical environmentalist. “Mr. Horner will bring another side to this issue, and that is the purpose of college—the discussion of issues.”

Horner’s presentation will be followed by a question and answer session. One topic that is sure to come up: how the recent elections will impact controversial ‘Cap and Trade’ legislation in Washington.

Horner shared some thoughts on the election fallout and other current efforts in Washington and the states with the MacIver News Service in advance of his speech.

“ ‘Cap and Trade’ is of course dead but there remains a push for a national windmill mandate as the newest vehicle to raise everyone’s electricity costs, and enormous wealth transfers being pushed by investors in the global warming industry apparently feeling stranded, like T. Boone Pickens,” said Horner. “Cap and Trade is declared dead even by Obama until at least 2013.”

Horner

Horner warns however, that anti-business environmental advocates, as he sees them, will continue to pursue their agenda in a whole host of manners.

“We’ve largely reached the likely saturation point in the ‘crazy quilt’ approach of certain usual-suspect states like California and New Jersey making a hash of things and complaining to Washington that it’s just not fair everyone isn’t forced to do the same things to themselves,” said Horner. “Meanwhile, several key federal avenues have been closed off to them. So now it’s off to windmill mandates and the like, federally, and other smaller ball ways of skinning the energy-scarcity cat.”

Horner blames what he calls environmental ‘gesture politics’ for many of the economic problems facing the states.

“California’s looming bankruptcy, which will be revolutionary if allowed to occur, can be attributed to these gesture politics of binge debt spending on payoffs to special interests who run campaigns like the global warming industry, and other such feelgoodery,” said Horner. “We’ll see if the other 48 states (New York, too, will sink) will pay, and how their taxpayers react, before we know just how much this has enlightened us.”

Recently, Wisconsin Congressman Jim Sensenbrenner (R-WI 05) suggested the new House Republican Majority in Washington maintain the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming created by Democrats but change its mission to one of a watchdog over the Environmental Protection Agency.

Horner is skeptical of such an approach.

“I would prefer aggressive oversight of ongoing spending, existing regulation and proposed regulation under existing, ‘standing’ committees because, after all, the money that requires scrutiny as to how it is being spent was authorized by existing committees whose authority includes oversight of the relevant statutory authority,” said Horner. “But there are no such things in DC as temporary committees.”

Horner notes the battles continue but will become less straightforward as the proponents of global warming legislation change their tactics, as a result of widespread public rejection of their more heavy-handed approach.

“They have to even further obscure what they are doing: going from the direct tax (on BTUs) to a backdoor tax with rationing and ration coupons (Cap and Trade), to indirect ‘standards” that are upon scrutiny mandates, styled as ‘requiring utilities to produce..,’ which means requiring you to buy more expensive less reliable uneconomic energy, paying back the utilities on a cost-plus basis,” said Horner. “It is toward those ends that the anti-energy industry is already scrambling on various Plans C-D-E etc., some styled as ‘things we all agree on’ though, as with most things sold that way, they are no such thing.”

Horner, who holds a Juris Doctorate from Washington University in St. Louis, is the author of the recently-released book, Power Grab: How Obama’s Green Policies Will Steal Your Freedom and Bankrupt America and The Politically Incorrect Guide to Global Warming and Environmentalism, which was published in 2007, and spent several months on the New York Times Best Selling List.

Horner has testified before the United States Senate Committees on Foreign Relations and Environment and Public Works, and works on a legal and policy level with numerous think tanks and policy organizations throughout the world. He has given numerous addresses to audiences in the European Parliament in Strasbourg and Brussels, and before policymakers in European capitals including London, Rome, Prague, Copenhagen, Madrid and Warsaw, on topics ranging from rail deregulation and unfunded pension liability to all manner of energy and environment issues.

This is Horner’s second trip to Wisconsin this year. In May, the author Red Hot Lies: How Global Warming Alarmists Use Threats, Fraud, and Deception to Keep You Misinformed spoke to a group of students and members of the general public in Oshkosh.

Tonight’s event, co-sponsored by the Young America’s Foundation, is free, open to the public, and will take place at 6:15 at Marquette University’s Weasler Auditorium on15th and Wells. Parking is available in the visitor parking structure on 16th Street. Doors open to the public at 5:30 pm.

Welcome (Back) to Wisconsin, Mr. President (Again)

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Dear President Obama,

Welcome back to Madison, Wisconsin—the site of one of the largest 2008 campaign rallies in support of Hope and Change.

Madison is home the Wisconsin State Capitol, the University of Wisconsin and is the heart and soul of the Democratic Party of Wisconsin. Madison is the bluest of blue cities and is the seat of Dane County, the most liberal of Wisconsin’s 72 counties. The tens of thousands who greet you today will warmly embrace you and vocally support your policies. You are always welcome in Wisconsin and, although you were here just three weeks ago, we are happy you have chosen to come to America’s Dairyland, yet again. We realize there are dozens of other places where you could appear before an adoring crowd, many in this country, even.  We are honored that you keep coming back to our state, and to our capital city, in particular.

As we are sure you are aware, Madison is also home of the John K. MacIver Institute for Public Policy, the Free Market Voice for Wisconsin. In fact, our office is a mere mile or so away from the site of your event today. So, we would be remiss if we didn’t proffer a few questions we hope you will answer during your exciting political rally.

Where are the jobs you promised?

Not only does the liberal hotbed of Madison guarantee you a favorable crowd, there is another benefit of coming to Dane County. Thanks to steady, taxpayer-funded employment provided by the largest public university in the state, and the jobs directly and indirectly tied to state government, unemployment in Dane County is a mere 5.4 percent. Had you chosen to visit Rock (10.2), Kenosha (10.1), Milwaukee (9.6), Marinette (10.3), Rusk (10.0) or Marathon (8.2) counties there would have been plenty of people with free time to come fill the seats, but the crowd may not have been as friendly. Since your Inauguration, Wisconsin’s economy has actually lost 111,500 jobs.

Should we be concerned that your economic team is bailing from the White House?

White House budget director Peter Orszag resigned in June. Christina Romer, chairman of your Council of Economic Advisers, has left her post. Economic Adviser Larry Summers has announced he is leaving soon. Rumors abound that Rahm Emanuel, your Chief of Staff, will soon take his Chicago-style politics straight to the Windy City itself in a bid to replace the departing Mayor Daley.

Some would see this as evidence your Administration is in disarray. We prefer to take the glass half full approach. Perhaps this is an opportunity for you to turn away from the failed Keynesian policies that are choking all growth potential in our economy.

If you are serious about spending, can we just bank the unspent stimulus funds, including the billions slated for a unneeded hodgepodge of high speed rail projects?

Your budget director, before he resigned, boasted about the Administrations efforts to control spending. In an entry dated May 24th, Orzag wrote: The Reduce Unnecessary Spending Act of 2010 alone is not enough to cut waste, streamline government operations, and create a government that is more responsive to the American people. Rather, it is part of a larger effort the President has undertaken to rein in wasteful spending.

According to the official Recovery.gov website, more than $250 billion  of the $787 billion stimulus funds have yet to be spent.

Much of this spending is for the construction of dubious projects like the little-used Milwaukee to Madison train line.

Can we agree to stop the ‘stimulus’ spending, today, and focus on ‘needs’ instead of funding a wish list of ‘wants?’

One last thing… about that push for education reform?

Just last November, you launched the Department of Education’s Race to the Top right here in Madison. While Wisconsin failed in that race (not once, but twice) we were still proud you chose us to host the announcement. The stated goal of the RTTT program is to encourage and reward states that are creating conditions for education innovation and reform. Yet, at MacIver, we’re concerned that your treatment of Washington, DC’s school choice program could be construed as evidence that RTTT is merely about spending more on an existing system rather than fundamentally improving the educational outcomes for children.

Proposed regulations on for-profit education will stand to shut down another avenue of innovation and reform for Americans as well. This will essentially choke out hundreds of institutions in order to create a less crowded playing field for public run institutions. However, if competition breeds the best environment for change, progression, and the evolution of a product, how can the removal of a key player be seen as a step forward for American education?

In any event, we do, sincerely, welcome you to Wisconsin. Today marks your sixth visit to this state since your Inauguration and your third this year.

Having long established itself as a progressive stronghold, many observers are surprised that you have felt compelled to come back so often. Yes, this state is bleeding jobs. Yes, the Tea Party movement is strong here. Yes, there is a growing discontent over out-of-control spending in general and the Milwaukee-Madison train boondoggle in particular. Yes, there is evidence that public employee unions, especially the teachers’ unions are losing their grip on power here. Still, we’re surprised to see you again, having just hosted you on Labor Day. (This year’s Labor Day, less than a month ago).

Don’t get us wrong, we are happy to receive the attention. However, if you keep showing up here every three weeks, we have to wonder whether you will make it to all 57 states before the end of your term.

In any event, Welcome. We will be on hand to hear your answers to these questions today. And if you can’t make it up to the Capitol Square this afternoon to stop in for a tour of our modest offices, maybe you can squeeze it in some other time. Perhaps when you come back here next month???

Sincerely,

Brian Fraley
Communications Director
The John K. MacIver Institute for Public Policy
www.MacIverInstitute.com

MacIver Institute’s Efforts to Continue in Wake of Supreme Court Ruling

.

The Free Market Voice for Wisconsin Remains Open for Business

[Madison, Wisconsin...] As a result of the Wisconsin State Supreme Court’s injunction prohibiting the enforcement of a controversial rule, the MacIver Institute’s policy analysis, website and archives remain publicly accessible over the internet. With the injunction blocking a rule that would limit the rights of individuals and organizations to criticize their government, the MacIver Institute will also continue to publish its research and distribute updates to their vast email list.

“We believe the GAB’s attempt to stifle criticism of elected officials runs counter to the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment and we are happy the State Supreme Court issued this injunction,” said MacIver Institute President Brett Healy. “With this reprieve, our website remains up and we’ll continue to churn out the information and analysis that thousands read every week.”

MacIver offers the public original news reporting through their copyright-free MacIver News Service. Any blogger, pamphleteer, newspaper or broadcast station in the state is free to reproduce our articles, with attribution, at no cost.

MacIver Institute analysts also produce research reports and provide commentary on the actions and policies of state and local governments, including the actions and policies of specific elected public servants.

The GAB’s rule would have restricted the rights of individuals and entities to inform, comment and criticize during the months prior to an election.

“The work of state government does not come to a complete stop 60 days prior to an election,” said Healy. “New administrative rules, burdensome regulations and even public policy ideas will be introduced throughout this time period and we will continue to report and comment on them.”

Thanks to their various distribution channels and social networking sites, MacIver’s work has been seen by hundreds of thousands of individuals over the last year and a half.

“The political class should spend less time trying to stifle free speech and criticism of their precious reputations and instead focus on the state’s out of control spending and crushing debt,” said Healy. “With a structural deficit of $2.5 billion and unemployment over 8%, Wisconsin needs their elected officials to grow the economy and bring back jobs.”

MacIver’s website is www.MacIverInstitute.com – individuals can sign up to receive updates at: http://maciverinstitute.com/contact-us/

www.MacIverInstitute.com | twitter.com/maciverwisc | http://www.facebook.com/MacIverInstitute http://www.youtube.com/user/MacIverInstitute

MacIver Institute Fights for its Free Speech Rights

The MacIver Institute has joined several other groups and individuals in a fight for their free speech rights.

The John K. MacIver Institute for Public Policy is a Wisconsin non-profit think tank, fully qualified as tax exempt under §501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Service Code. We provide the public with original news reporting, analysis and commentary on the actions and policies of state and local governments, including the actions and policies of specific elected public servants.

The MacIver Institute cares about public policy and the impact public policy decisions will have on Wisconsin’s future. Like all such organizations, the MacIver Institute must certify compliance with IRS regulations, including a certification that it has not engaged in political activities. If we fail to comply, we can lose our tax exempt status.

Unfortunately, the Government Accountability Board has created its own rule that contradicts the decisions of the United States and Wisconsin Supreme Courts. The new rule labels as “political” activity all communications that identify someone who happens to be a candidate for office and that express approval or disapproval of that person’s character or positions on the issues the communication discusses. If we publish any such communications within 60 days of an election, we must open a bank account, transfer to the account the funds used in publishing the communications, register with the GAB, pay he GAB a $100 fee, identify the communications, file a sworn oath that they are not “independent” expenditures, attach a disclaimer to each one, record them, and file campaign finance reports about our activities, including 24 hour reports during the last 15 days before the election.

The work of state government does not come to a complete stop 60 days prior to an election date.
New administrative rules, burdensome regulations and even public policy ideas will be introduced throughout this time period.
The public has a fundamental right to know what its government is up to and debate these proposals in the public square.
The new GAB rule does not allow the MacIver Institute to provide this public service without the prior approval of the State.

Arbitrarily set time frames for this debate will not work. Unelected bureaucrats should not fear nor curtail this discussion of ideas or interfere with free speech. The John K. MacIver Institute for Public Policy cannot accede to the newly minted definition of amended GAB 1.28, so we will have little choice but to cease what we have freely and openly done since our inception unless the court intervenes.


MacIver on facebook @MacIverWisc on twitter MacIver Youtube channel subscribe