Posts Tagged ‘Labor Unions’

So, What Became of the GAB’s Searchable Recall Petition Database?

MacIver News Service | February 2, 2012

[Madison, Wisc...] The top official at the Government Accountability Board says the GAB  decided not to buy software to transfer handwritten recall petitions into a searchable database, because it’s too expensive.  However, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported more than two weeks ago that the state already bought the software for $100,000.

The Wisconsin Eye public affairs network asked GAB executive director Kevin Kennedy Wednesday about the decision not to create a searchable database that would be available to the public.  Kennedy said they didn’t have the manpower or the money.

“The type of software you would need to convert these PDF files is very expensive,” Kennedy said. “When we do our duplicate review we might have a searchable database but it will be limited only to names.”

So, did they spend money on software that can create a database from scanned handwritten documents?

On January 21, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported the GAB will be “relying on newly purchased software that can convert handwritten names into entries in six searchable databases.”

Do they have the software, or not? Are they using it, or not?  If the software can read the printed names and signatures, why can’t it convert the addresses as well?

Why has the GAB chosen not to put  a searchable database online?

Do they have any internal work product that would be useful to independent efforts to validate the signatures?

The MacIver News Service contacted the GAB on Thursday. It has not yet received a response.

Stunner: Walker Recall Petitions NOT Available for Online Review

MacIver News Service | January 30, 2012

[Madison, Wisc…] The Wisconsin Government Accountability Board has not posted scanned copies of the Governor Walker recall petitions online despite promises to the citizens of Wisconsin that they would do so.

GAB staff delivered copies of the scans to the Governor’s campaign late last week. The campaign, with the assistance of the Republican Party of Wisconsin, began reviewing the petitions at satellite offices across the state this weekend.

Once they scanned documents, they were going to make them public, having issued an alert to all media earlier in the day. The revelation was the top of many radio broadcasts Monday.

Such a public disclosure would have allowed the volunteers at the independent VerifytheRecall.com to also begin their effort.

But early this evening the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported GAB staff was going back on their promise, citing alleged privacy concerns by some who signed the public documents.

This is the latest development in a series of back and forth decisions by the GAB that promises more legal challenges ahead.

And it could thwart a massive effort by Tea Party groups to conduct an independent review of the petitions.

“Never before have regular citizens organized in this way to this scale in a nonpartisan sense to uphold the integrity of Wisconsin’s elections,” said Ross Brown,  Founder and President of the Tea Party Group, We the People of the Republic and co-organizer of the Verify The Recall effort before the GAB’s surprise announcement was made. “Our volunteers are anxious to start and committed to the effort.”

Brown said approximately 87 percent of the more than 11,000 volunteers who signed up at his website are from Wisconsin, although they do have volunteers from all but one of the 50 states.

“Verify the Recall has written a new play in the citizens’ playbook as to how we can preserve our clean and honest elections,” Brown said.

With Monday night’s revelation that the GAB was refusing to comply with their earlier public pronouncements, the Verify the Recall process could be in jeopardy.

As previously reported, the GAB had originally intended to only provide a cursory review of the signatures, having interpreted the statutes to put more of the verification onus on the recall targets. They had no intention of putting the signatures online.

In the days after the Senate petitions were placed online, social media sites and talk radio were filled with claims of problems with the petitions.

In late December, Assembly Speaker Jeff Fitzgerald (R-Horicon) received a memo from the nonpartisan Legislative Council, which explained the GAB was proactively choosing not to create a database and was not prohibited from doing so.

“The statutes do not impose explicit barriers to the creation of a GAB database that contains the names and addresses of individuals who sign recall petitions or to public availability of the database,” said Katie Bender-Olson, Staff Attorney with the Wisconsin Legislative Council in a memo to the Speaker “To the contrary, the statute enumerating the powers and duties of GAB may support the agency’s authority to create a recall signature database and make it accessible to the public.”

“The A in GAB stands for accountability,” said Speaker Fitzgerald at the time “I would hope this memo encourages them to provide the public with a nonpartisan source of important data that could help root out possible duplicate signatures and fraud.”

The memo continued, “There do not appear to be any specific statutory obstacles to the creation or availability of such a database,” Bender-Olson wrote. “Further, the GAB itself appears to believe that the creation of a recall signature database and the public availability of recall petition signature information are permissible.”

State Republican Party of Wisconsin Executive Director Stephan Thompson had earlier filed suit against the GAB requiring more aggressive verification procedures by the GAB. Waukesha Circuit Court Judge Mac Davis ruled this month that the GAB needed to check for duplicates and obvious fake names.

In the wake of Judge Davis’ ruling, and negative publicity surrounding their own comments regarding the potential validity of signatures of Mickey Mouse and Hitler, the GAB decided to scan the petitions, begin a more vigorous review and place the scanned copies of all petitions online.

On Monday morning they announced the signatures would be available later in the day. As the day went on, the information remained absent from their website.

In addition to the recruiting volunteers to data enter signatures, Brown’s group created a ‘no sign’ list, for which individuals could sign up to be notified if their names fraudulently appeared on the Walker recall petitions.

“Over 50,000 Wisconsinites have protected their name and address against fraudulent petition use by signing up for our “No Sign Registration List,” Brown told MacIver News Service.  “Individuals have also submitted the names of their deceased family members and underage children on this list. Verify the Recall will notify anyone who signs up for this list if their name and/or address is found anywhere on a recall petition.”

Without access to the petitions to create a searchable database, the ‘No sign’ list project would also not be able to be completed.

The MacIver News Service will have more on this story as it develops.

___

Recall petitions were to be posted online at the GAB Website.

Verify the Recall, the project of We The People of the Republic and the Wisconsin Grandsons of Liberty can be found online here.

Gov. Walker Delivers State of the State Address

MacIver News Service | January 25, 2012

[Madison, Wisc…] Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker delivered his annual State of the State address Wednesday night before a polarized state legislature and with a potential recall looming.

“When I addressed you in the chamber last January, Wisconsin had suffered through three years of 150,000 of our fellow citizens losing their jobs,” Walker said. “The unemployment rate was 7.5%. And after years of tax increases and budget tricks, Wisconsin faced one of the largest budget deficits in the country.”

Walker boasted about the progress made in the last year.

“Tonight I’m happy to report that after three years of losing 150,000 jobs Wisconsin actually added thousands of new jobs in 2011,” said Walker. “New business formations are up by over two percent and our unemployment rate is down from a year ago. In fact, Wisconsin’s unemployment rate is much better than our neighbors to the south in Illinois.”

The governor outlined three priorities for his Administration

  • Helping the people of Wisconsin create more jobs
  • Keeping a balanced budget
  • Improving education for our kids by working together

“Last year, we passed some of the most aggressive pro-jobs legislation in the country,” Walker said. “And we did it with the help from lawmakers in both parties because these aren’t Republican or Democrat jobs, they’re Wisconsin jobs.”

Walker used the occasion to again push for passage of a bill to modernize Wisconsin’s mining laws and regulations.

“There is another tremendous opportunity for job growth,” he said. “We can pass legislation that will streamline the process for safe and environmentally sound mining. The proposed project in northwestern Wisconsin could provide at least 700 jobs at the mine and thousands across the state.”

Walker’s optimistic tone was belied by the fact that Big Labor and the Democratic party attempted to recall six Republican senators in 2011. They failed to gain the senate majority, defeating only two of them.

In 2012, four GOP Senators, the Lt. Governor and the Governor himself may be facing recall elections, depending on the certification of signatures pending before the Government Accountability Board.

Walker’s speech ignored the pending elections, although his speech highlighted past success as much as it laid out a vision of the future.

“[F]rugality in government leads to freedom and prosperity for our people,” Walker said, quoting from the Wisconsin Constitution. “I believe our founders had it right.”

Walker went on to promote his ‘brown bag’ frugality.

“Think about it, when I spoke here last January, Wiscosnin faced a $3.6 billion deficit,” Walker said. “In the past, state government took more than a billion dollars away from building safe roads and bridges, illegally raided the fund to support malpractice victims and ignored a payment to Minnesota for tax reciprocity. And one-time federal stimulus money was used for ongoing costs—all of thse practices left us with a more than $3 billion hole to fill last year.”

Walker then drew distinctions between the approach Wisconsin took with those of other states who also faced budget crunches.

“Some, like Illinois, raised taxes, but that only made matters worse,” Walekr said. “Other states used massive layoffs to balance their budgets; we avoided that in Wisconsin.”

He continued, “Some states cut core services like Medicaid. But in Wisconsin, we added some $1.2 billion to Medicaid and our reforms allow us to expand FamilyCare (our long-term care program for seniors) all across the state.

Walker did not ignore the controversial changes to public labor union bargaining that has spurred and financed the recall efforts.

“Just as important as saving money, our reforms help government work well in places where it does have a legitimate role, like education,” he said. “For example, before our reforms, school districts often had to buy their helath insurance from one company which cost them millions of dollars.”

Since the passage of ACT 10, several districts have been able to save money by putting their health insurance out for competitive bidding.

“[O]ur reforms now allow local school districts to staff based on merit and pay based on performance,” said the Governor. “That means we can put the best and brightest in our classrooms, and we can keep them there.”

The governor told of a superintendent of a small school district in Wisconsin who praised his labor reforms and told him “now I get to go back to my office and focus on curriculum instead of grievances.”

Governor Walker then made a direct appeal to Wisconsin’s public employees.

“Tonight, I want to again thank the many teachers and public servants across the state of Wisconsin,” he said. “We appreciate your hard work serving the public. And we are glad that Wisconsin avoided the massive layoffs of government employees experienced in other states.”

Walker used the final quarter of his speech to highlight three education reform efforts that, after a year of discussion and consensus building, will be in the hands of the legislature this spring.

He promoted his Read to Lead, school and school district accountability plans.

“[State School Superintendent] Dr. Evers and I have been working with a diverse group of individuals to develop our plan to let parents, teachers and communities know which schools are performing well so that we can replicate their success,” Walker said. “And we do need to know which schools are failing,” so we can help them.

Whether or not the legislature is able to pass these and other measures like the mining bill in such a caustic atmosphere poisoned by the threat of ongoing recall elections remains to be seen.

One early test, the State Assembly is scheduled to take up the mining proposal on Thursday.

“In just one year, Republicans fixed a $3 billion deficit, cut new debt in half, held the line on taxes and improved our business climate in nearly every ranking,” said State Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald (R-Juneau). “On the other hand, the Democrats spent the last year protesting, recalling and playing politics with our business climate.”

Fitzgerald continued to express pessimistic tone.

“They know that recalls are bad for Wisconsin, but they’re pushing them anyway. For the Democrats, the state of our state won’t ever be good enough unless they’re in the driver’s seat,” said Fitzgerald. “But Wisconsin needs jobs, not politics.”

Full text of remarks, as prepared for delivery: SOSText

Ed: We will update this story to include more reactions in the hours ahead.

Records Show Few People Actually Complained About Waukesha School Board Member’s Participation in Political Ad

MacIver News Service | December 29, 2011

[Waukesha, Wisc...] Despite the media attention it received, less than two dozen people contacted Waukesha School Board to complain about a member’s appearance in a political ad, the MacIver News Service has learned

Only 22 people contacted the Waukesha School Board and District about a board member’s appearance in a Governor Walker ad, and many of them were not Waukesha residents according to information gleaned from an open records request filed by the MacIver News Service.

The ad featured a woman named “Karin,” who was identified as a “School Board Member.” She talked about how changes to collective bargaining helped her district balance its budget.

Gov. Walker Television Commercial

Critics later discovered the person in the ad was Karin Rajnicek, a member of the Waukesha School Board. Some of her fellow board members publicly revealed their displeasure with Rajnicek’s participation in the Walker campaign.

On November 29, the school board’s policy committee discussed the ad. The committee consists of Rajnicek and her fellow board members Ellen Langill, and Barbara Brzenk.

Langill demanded a public apology from Rajnicek for breaking a Waukesha School Board policy (Number 8300) that states board members may not represent the school board without permission. Rajnicek did not apologize.

At the time of that meeting, the district had received ten to 12 complaints.  (Two complaints did not include any identifying information or date). Only four were from Waukesha residents, and three of them were former teachers or education professionals. One of the complaints was from a lawyer in San Francisco.

“You’re a joke.  Do you feel better now that you got paid OFF a hefty, hefty sum to appear in a bogus, misinformation campaign ad for a sociopath, totally irresponsible, environmentally-decimating governor who’s about to be recalled?”  Dana Hanaman, the San Francisco attorney wrote. “Soon YOU won’t have any clean water to drink or air to breathe, and your children WILL be dumber than rocks and without any jobs. BEWARE. Just remember…what comes around, goes around.”

Rajnicek notes she was not compensated to appear in the commercial.

A person named Jay Mielke wrote, “You are a WALKER TOOL.”

Patty Barrett, a Waukesha resident, wrote “as a newly elected board member, I believe you had no business presenting yourself as such an expert on the financial situation of our district.”

Eileen Potts Dawson, from Madison, wrote, “It feels like a betrayal for your board to remain silent if there are some of you who know that what she states in the ad does not reflect what has happened.”

“School board members are suppose to be impartial and work for the school district,” Amy Bedessem, from Pardeeville, wrote the superintendent’s office. “How have the cuts helped your school? Why is she still on this board? Her ad is misleading and is creating a bad name for Waukesha Schools. Please do something about this woman.”

In an interview with the MacIver News Service, Rajnicek noted that nowhere in the ad was she identified as speaking for the district and that in all subsequent media releases from the Walker campaign, it was to be made clear that she was offering her personal opinion only.

After the November 29 meeting and the subsequent media attention it received, the District only received emails from another ten people about the ad and seven of them supported Rajnicek. Six of the emails were from Waukesha residents; of those, four supported Rajnicek and two criticized her.

Robert Kohl, Waukesha resident, wrote “As a citizen and a taxpayer of Waukesha school district, I will not tolerate the constant drumbeat of harassment that seems to greet anyone who supports Gov. Walker.”

Chad Vendette, Waukesha resident, wrote “They may think you do not speak for them, but I can assure you Ms. Rajnicek, you DO speak for us, the Taxpayers of Waukesha County.”

Kurt Burie, another Waukesha resident, wrote “Based on your attempt to admonish Mrs. Rajnicek for her support of Gov. Walker, I will assume that you are against the collective bargaining reforms so I will not be voting for you in the next election.”

Of all the 22 people who contacted the district about the ad ,only ten were from Waukesha. Fifteen of the letters were critical of Rajnicek, seven of those were from teachers/educators.

In November the Waukesha Patch reported “Langill and Brzenk said after the meeting that they, along with other board members, have received calls, letters and emails about Rajnicek’s appearance in the video.”

Langill did not produce any evidence that she was contacted by anyone about the ad, in spite of the legal implications of the open records request. That may not be surprising because, unlike most of her fellow board members, her email address is not listed on the district’s website.  She did not return a phone call from the MNS seeking to clarify her comments.

We will update this story as events warrant.

The transcript of the ad:

Karin, School Board Member:  We were worried when the state budget was going to mean less money for our school district, and we have 25 schools.  But Governor Walker gave us options that reduced our biggest costs so that we could put more money back into our classrooms.”

Gov. Walker:  ”I’m committed to working together to create more jobs, to improve our schools, and to protect our seniors.  You know, Wisconsin’s best days are yet to come.  It won’t happen overnight, but we are on our way.”

Fear of Big Government Continues to Rise

Click here for the full polling results from Gallup

Freed from Union Contracts, School Districts Able to Shed Costly Sick Leave Conversion Programs

MacIver News Service | December 8, 2011

While many school districts across Wisconsin have taken steps to protect themselves against unpredictable sick leave policy expenses, others have been hit hard this past year by an unusually high number of retirements.

Thanks to changes in the state law governing public employees, districts can make changes in these programs without having to negotiate with local teachers’ unions.

The MacIver News Service has been conducting research on how different levels of government are impacted by sick leave policy across Wisconsin.  Some policies allow retiring employees to convert unused sick leave into either cash or insurance premiums upon retirement.

We reached out to school district officials across the state, enquiring about their sick leave policies. Almost 80 responded to our requests for information.

Like all levels of government, school districts tend to be generous with sick leave when compared to the private sector. Teachers typically earn 10 to 12 sick days a year, and are allowed to accumulate anywhere from 50 to 160 days. Some districts do not have a limit on how many days can be banked.

What happens to those days when a teacher retires varies greatly. Some districts allow teachers to convert them to cash. Others allow the days to be converted into credits for post-retirement health insurance. And in more than a quarter of the districts that responded, those days are lost upon retirement.

Two superintendents stated their districts view “good health as it’s own reward.”

There were a handful of districts that do not cap the number of days a teacher can bank.  In most of them, those days are lost at retirement anyway. However, two districts, Tomorrow River Schools in Portage County and Sun Prairie school district in Dane County, convert those days into insurance credits. A three year breakdown shows how unpredictable this expense can be.

In 2008-09 TRS paid out $74,970 and SP paid out $27,981. In 2009-10 TRS paid out $102,166 and SP paid out $38,839.  Finally in 2010-11 TRS paid out $118,809 and SP paid out $46,402.

As for districts that pay out sick leave in cash, Palmyra and Sauk Prairie got hit the hardest. In 2009-10 Palmyra paid out $41,331.  In 2010-11 it paid out $109,322.  In 2009-10 Sauk Prairie paid out $45,000.  In 2010-11 it paid out $193,000.

By the way, Palmyra serves a total of 1,152 students and Sauk Prairie serves 2,718, according to DPI.

With Act 10 now in effect, many districts are replacing labor contracts with employee handbooks.  Some districts, like Eau Claire, are moving away from these policies that allow unused sick leave to be cashed out upon retirement.

This is the latest in a series of articles on public employee compensation in Wisconsin.The MacIver News Service earlier reported state employees who had retired in 2011 to that point had converted more than $340 million of unused sick leave into insurance credits. MNS also reported on local governments’ sick leave pay out policies, which also cost millions of dollars annually.

HCTrends Highlights Additional Act 10 Savings

MacIver News Service | December 2, 2011

[Madison, Wisc..] In their latest report, HCTrends is highlighting more evidence that Wisconsin’s public labor compensation reforms are working.

According to their analysis, taxpayers will save approximately $155 million next year due to changes in the benefit design for health plans offered to state employees.

“While most of the public debate over Act 10 focused on collective bargaining and health plan contributions, the budget-repair legislation also mandated that the benefit design be changed to achieve a 5-percent reduction in premium costs based on actuarial analysis,” says Dave Jensen, editorial director of HCTrends. “This is a significant step for the state, even though the cost-sharing remains significantly below private-sector averages.”

Jensen notes that most of the savings, approximately $90 million, will be realized as state employees pay a greater share of the premium costs; however, taxpayers will save an additional $65 million due to a new requirement that state employees pay 10 percent of their medical costs up to an out-of-pocket maximum of $500 for individuals and $1,000 for families.

HCTrends’ latest Greater Milwaukee Employer Health Care Benefits Survey showed that health plans offered by large employers typically have a 20 percent coinsurance requirement and out-of-pocket maximums of $2,500 for single plans and $5,000 for family plans.

While the public sector plans remain far more lucrative then the average benefits offered in the private sector, the new state plan design reduced 2012 premiums for the 26 health plans offered to state employees by an average of 2 percent, the first year-to-year decrease in more than 10 years.

HCTrends Notes that health plans serving southeastern Wisconsin, northern Wisconsin (Wausau) and Western Wisconsin (La Crosse) lowered their premiums by an average of 4 percent, while plans serving northeastern Wisconsin and south central Wisconsin lowered their premiums by 3 percent.

HCTrends is a forum committed to promoting meaningful dialogue on the health care challenges facing the provider and business communities.

HCTrends’s mission is to be the premier forum for market-oriented health care solutions in the Milwaukee Region and beyond. In addition to its website, HCTrends publishes a newsletter that is available in both digital and printed formats at HCTrends.com.

Failure to Adjust Union Contracts in Milwaukee, Kenosha Leads to Most Teacher Reductions in Wisconsin

By Christian D’Andrea
MacIver Institute Education Policy Analyst

The Wisconsin Association of School District Administrators (WASDA) recently released a survey of many Wisconsin school districts to gauge how local institutions are dealing with the 2011-2013 state budget. The results painted a disappointing picture for the public schools, detailing staff cuts and larger classroom sizes on average across the state. However, a closer look suggests that two Wisconsin districts – districts that refused to reopen their contracts to make employee benefit contributions and save significant sums of money – may skew the overall outlook of these polls.

Milwaukee and Kenosha are two of the state’s three largest school districts. They serve 80,934 and 22,986 students, respectively, according to DPI’s latest enrollment counts. They are also the highest profile holdouts when it came to Act 10, employee benefit reform, and the 2011-2013 state budget.

We’ve covered the cases in Milwaukee and Kenosha before. Each district has chosen to maintain their preexisting contracts rather than modify them, which means that the two systems faced significant budget shortcomings in the current year. Had either district adjusted their contracts to accept employee contributions to health insurance and pension costs, millions of dollars would have been saved in both cities. This would have allowed more money to flow into the classrooms and save teaching jobs.

The impact of the district’s inability to renegotiate their contracts is staggering. The two cities are head-and-shoulders above the rest of Wisconsin when it comes to negative effects like teacher layoffs and increases in classroom sizes, according to the survey’s raw data.

The WASDA survey uncovered a reduction of 1,675.84 teaching positions in the state of Wisconsin for the current school year. Over half of these unfilled jobs came from Milwaukee and Kenosha.

Milwaukee and Kenosha combined for a reduction of 869 full time teaching positions for the 2011-2012 school year. Despite educating approximately one-seventh (14.6 percent) of the students covered in the WASDA survey, they constituted over half of the educator losses. 51.9 percent of the vacant jobs recorded in the raw data are from the two districts, including 613 unfilled positions in Milwaukee.

According to survey data, 61 teachers retired in Kenosha. Another 94 were laid off and 166 more did not have their contracts renewed for the 2011-2012 school year. In Milwaukee, there were 137 retirements, 345 layoffs, and 173 non-renewals amongst the teaching staff. Milwaukee also saw 325 teacher aides receive pink slips for the year, along with 64 members of their support staff. Conversely, Madison Metropolitan School District, the state’s second largest district, reported zero teacher layoffs for the school year.

Statewide, there was a student to teacher ratio of approximately 14.22 students for every teacher. In Milwaukee and Kenosha, this figure rose to 17.29. If you exclude the two cities – the state’s largest districts that have not included employee contributions to offset funding decreases contained in the 2011-2013 state budget – from Wisconsin’s total, the ratio drops to just under 13.8 students for every teacher in the state.

According to survey data, Milwaukee’s student:teacher ratio rose from 18.9 to 21.5 – the highest mark in the state. In Kenosha this figure increased from 13.7 to 16.1. It should be noted that the survey’s student:teacher ratio figures differ slightly from the raw data of dividing annual third Friday enrollment counts by teacher staffing data.

Many districts have faced financial hardships in the midst of Wisconsin’s economic downturn. However, the results of the WASDA survey aren’t as dramatic as they appear if you exclude the two largest districts; districts that refused to reopen their contracts and save teacher jobs. Milwaukee and Kenosha make up the bulk of the state’s disappointing results – but if they had agreed to concessions, their class sizes would have been smaller and fewer teachers – both young and old – would be looking for new positions.

Problem of Duplicate Signatures Looms Over Recall

MacIver News Service | November 29, 2011

[Madison, Wisc…] The state board overseeing the potential recall election of Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker tells the MacIver News Service that they will rely upon temporary workers to scrutinize recall petitions and those individuals will not be expected to catch any duplicate signatures submitted by recall organizers.

This revelation comes as one statewide liberal group is actively promoting the collection of duplicate signatures, paving the way for a lengthy process wherein Walker supporters will challenge the validity of the recall petitions.

Screen shot from One Wisconsin Now's website

One Wisconsin Now, a liberal non-profit, posted on its website “You can circulate or sign a recall petition even if you have already signed another recall petition.”

This advice, however, will complicate the signature challenge process and runs counter to the advice of nonpartisan state election regulators.

“While it is not illegal to sign more than once, we do not suggest people sign a second time unless they have good reason to believe the first petition they signed was somehow fraudulent,” Reid Magney, GAB Spokesman.

One Wisconsin Now follows their advice with this disclaimer: “[N]ote, however, that only one signature per person will be counted.

That is not necessarily true.

Magney told MNS said that the pro-union groups obtaining recall signatures will be expected to self-police the collection of duplicate signatures.

However, neither the state Democratic Party nor the pro-labor organizations steering the recall drive have disclosed any process by which they will identify and discard the duplicate signatures they obtain.

Recall organizers announced Monday that they have collected 300,000 of the 540,000 signatures necessary to trigger a recall election of Walker. Until those signatures are actually submitted to the GAB, however, there is no way to verify that claim or determine whether that figure includes duplicate signatures. Even then, it will be up to outside groups like the Walker campaign or the state Republican Party to sort through the signatures to find any invalid and/or duplicate signatures.

Until the signatures are submitted and independently checked, there is no way to know how many people are heeding One Wisconsin Now’s advice.

Magney noted the GAB will flag duplicate signatures in the event they easily discover them. However, the GAB will not be entering the hand-written information into a searchable database to check for duplicates. The recall committee and the incumbent targeted for recall are the ones primarily responsible for catching the extra signatures, he said.

“It is in the recall committee’s interest to identify and eliminate duplicate signatures because duplicates would inflate the numbers and make them more vulnerable to challenge by the incumbent,” said Magney.

Recall groups have stated their goal is to collect 700,000 by the January 17 deadline. They need to obtain 540,208 valid signatures to trigger a recall.

Further complicating the review of the signatures, the GAB plans to hire temporary workers to perform these duties under the supervision of regular GAB staff. The temps will be hired through agencies that have contracts with the Department of Administration, according to the GAB.

As of November 17, the GAB estimated the cost of reviewing the petitions will be at least $625,699. This figure does not include the cost borne by municipal county and state government to hold the recall election.

Two-Faced Barrett or Evil Twin?
Milwaukee’s Mayor on Ohio, Wis. Act 10

By James Wigderson
Special Guest Perspective for the MacIver Institute

Last Tuesday, voters in Ohio reversed an attempt to curb collective bargaining privileges for government employees. Unlike in Wisconsin, Ohio voters can petition to put acts of the legislature on the ballot for approval. Also unlike Wisconsin, Ohio never had a chance to implement the collective bargaining reforms to see the law in action. The Ohio law also imposed far greater concessions on public employees than Wisconsin’s new reforms. Finally, the Ohio law covered law enforcement and firefighters, allowing opponents to attack the law using public safety as an issue.

Despite those differences, opponents of the changes to collective bargaining for public employees in Wisconsin have claimed the Ohio experience gives momentum to the upcoming recall effort.

Getting caught up in the giddiness was city of Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett. In a press release on the Wednesday following the Ohio election, Barrett said, “Yesterday, Ohio citizens from every walk of life resoundingly rejected the extreme measures Governor Kasich took in eliminating the basic rights of workers. Here in Wisconsin we have seen that same extreme attack.”

He continued, “Governor Walker should do the right thing and immediately restore workers rights to organize and bargain in good faith. End this attack now and focus on creating jobs and getting Wisconsin’s economy growing.”

Readers of the press release might be forgiven for wondering if celebrated nice guy Barrett suddenly acquired an evil twin.  Barrett has not only used the changes in collective bargaining to manage the city of Milwaukee’s budget, he actually complained that the new law did not go far enough.

During the debate over the collective bargaining changes, Barrett complained that the law did not include police and firefighter unions. While protesting that he supported the ability of government employees to bargain over benefits, in a letter to legislative leaders Barrett wrote,

The Governor’s bill does not reduce the costs that middle class taxpayers in Milwaukee will pay for police and fire pension and health care benefits. The City will be forced to continue to pay the entire employee contribution for police and fire pensions, missing out on savings of approximately $14.4 million annually. This is compared to the pension savings from other unions and general city employees that will only total $8.3 million annually. In addition, all other unions and general city employees will pay 12% for their health care benefits, while the average police and fire employee will continue paying less than 4%.

More shocking, is the impact that excluding police and fire employees will have on the continuing costs of retiree health care that will primarily be paid by Milwaukee’s middle class. For non-protective service unions and general city employees, the average post retirement health care liability is $50,214. This is the amount that taxpayers now pay for each non-protective service union member and general city retiree before they become eligible for Medicare. That amount will be significantly reduced because of the 12% insurance contribution the Budget Repair Bill provides. Contrast that to the average post retirement health care liability for firefighters of $136,469 and police officers at $123,272.

Barrett described the retirement benefits for police and firefighters as “Cadillac” and added,

“Although active fire and police employees comprise only 39% of the City workforce, their retiree health care costs account for nearly two-thirds of the City’s $959.6 million unfunded post-retirement health care benefit. It’s unfortunate, but the Governor believes that these costs are a burden middle class Milwaukee taxpayers should be forced to bear.”

So on the one hand, Barrett said he could get government employee unions to make the concessions necessary to balance the city budget. On the other hand, Barrett complained that the change in the collective bargaining law did not include police and firefighters, and as a result the unions that retained their collective bargaining privileges kept “Cadillac” benefits.

It’s even more interesting that Barrett complained about the “Cadillac” benefits and the continued bargaining privileges of the police and firefighter unions when one of the major reasons the Ohio law was defeated was the inclusion of the police and firefighters. Barrett cheered for the result, even though he opposed in Wisconsin the provision that defeated the change in collective bargaining privileges in Ohio.

In fact, Barrett had previously praised Ohio for including police and firefighters in the collective bargaining changes.

“Republican Governors in Ohio and New Jersey who are facing similar budget crises have moved to increase public employee contributions for health care and pension as well,” Barret wrote previously. “However, unlike Governor Walker, those Governors have chosen not to exempt police and fire unions from the collective sacrifice that must be made to bring state and local finances under control in this economy.”

Barrett did use the changes to the collective bargaining law to his advantage in the city of Milwaukee budget process. The city of Milwaukee expects to save at least $25 million per year from the employee health benefit savings. Perhaps Barrett would like the taxpayers in the city to give back the savings so he can have a clear conscience?

Or perhaps those savings were why, when the Democratic members of the state senate stalled the state budget repair bill containing the collective bargaining changes by leaving the state, Barrett challenged the Republicans to pass the changes separately. Ironically, the Republicans followed Barrett’s advice by passing what is now known as Act 10, the law that Barrett incredulously now claims he wants to repeal.

At least, if that press release was sent by the real Tom Barrett.

But just who that is, is anyone’s guess.

  • Print
  • Email This Post Email This Post
  • Share

Recent Posts


MacIver on facebook @MacIverWisc on twitter MacIver Youtube channel subscribe