Posts Tagged ‘Open Records’

Governor Walker Signs Balanced Budget with No Tax Increases

Fifty Vetoes Include Provisions on Milwaukee Police Pay, Access Restrictions on Public Officials’ Financial Connections, Spaceport Earmark

MacIver News Service | June 26, 2011 | Updated 5:30 pm

[Green Bay, Wisc…] Stressing the desire to create a better jobs climate in Wisconsin, Governor Scott Walker today signed the 2011-13 budget at a Green Bay manufacturing plant.

The budget balances a $3.6 billion deficit without raising taxes and, Walker says, continues to support critical services, while promoting job growth and investing in education.

“Our balanced budget makes tough choices while providing a path to recovery and prosperity for our state and our people,” Governor Walker (R) said at Fox Valley Metal-Tech.  “Through honest budgeting, we are showing the way forward.”

Walker’s plan received high praise from Wisconsin’s business community.

“Governor Walker and legislative Republicans deserve tremendous credit for making tough decisions to balance the state budget without raising taxes,” said Kurt R. Bauer, President/CEO of Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce. “The budget provides greater certainty for business executives and that should encourage job growth.”

Still Photo Captured from YouTube Video of Budget Address

The budget eliminates the state’s $3.6 billion deficit. Only seven states in the nation faced larger per capita deficits than Wisconsin.

“Just as any parent would dread leaving their kids in debt, it is the dream of every father and mother to leave their children a little better off, and that’s what our budget will do,” said Governor Walker.

The governor issued 50 revisions to the plan legislators sent him, although the controversial restrictions on craft brewers survived his veto pen.

In part, Walker:

  • Vetoed a provision allowing Milwaukee police officers to be paid while appealing dismissal
  • Eliminated the provision restricting public access to officials’ economic interest statements
  • Cut the $10,000 in segregated fees earmarked to the Aerospace Authority in Sheboygan
  • Issued a partial veto regarding WiscNet that will prohibit UW System from competing with private sector businesses in telecom services and removes the ability of the Joint Committee on Finance to waive deadlines
  • Vetoed the requirement that all child care providers submit fingerprints to state and instead will seeks rule change to mandate for those providers participating in Wisconsin Shares

The governor’s full veto message can be found, here:

Walker highlighted the plan’s property tax freeze, which he says will save the average homeowner over $700 dollars over the next two years.

“It is my hope that due to this budget, thousands of Wisconsinites can breathe just a little bit easier and not worry about how they’re going to stay in the home they love,” said walker.

The budget also includes a manufacturing tax credit and capital gains tax credit aimed at creating jobs in Wisconsin.

While legislative Demcorats were critical of the spending cuts in the plan, Republicans were adamant that the budget continues support for BadgerCare, Medical Assistance, and SeniorCare. They say the budget allocates an additional $1.2 billion into the state’s Medicaid program and the note that nearly all new revenue the state receives over the next two years will go to the Department of Health Services.

“The budget signed into law today by Gov. Walker that shamelessly attacks Wisconsin’s shared values and middle class families is certainly a dark chapter in our state’s proud history,” said Assembly Minority Leader Peter Barca (D-Kenosha) in an online post Sunday. “We must continue to tell the stories of struggling middle-class, working Wisconsinites that will suffer additional hardships as a result of Gov. Walker’s poor budget choices and his assault on worker rights.”

Despite $800 million in cuts to aid to local school districts, Walker says the budget continues to prioritize education.  Public K-12 schools are the single largest expenditure in the budget, he notes, and the state will also begin a new statewide student information system which will allow for real-time state-wide data collection from schools on everything from course grades to attendance.  That will allow for better tracking of students and better accountability metrics for teachers, administrators, and schools, supporters argue.

The Governor’s budget also expands Choice and Charter schools, removing the enrollment caps on the state’s online public virtual charter schools and the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program, while beginning a choice program in Racine.

In his budget remarks, the Governor expressed optimism that the tumult of recent months in Madison could be a thing of the past.

“The recent debates in Madison found us spending too much time focused on our differences, rather than our similarities,” Walker said. “But today we turn the page.”

Barca, however, signaled that the acrimony is likely to continue.

“To take back our state legislature and to build our case for recalling Gov. Walker and Republican senators in the months ahead, we must continue to pull back the shroud of darkness and secrecy they have imposed on our state – we have to provide the sunlight that will ultimately disinfect Wisconsin of their radical and misguided agenda,” he wrote.

Yet, Walker said his experiences hearing from the families of Wisconsin gives him reason to be optimistic.

“We may disagree on the issue of the day, but we always find a way to unite and reach out when it means helping our neighbors in need; or inspiring our children to achieve success,” said Walker.

MacIver Solicits Information Regarding Labor Contracts, Union Membership Renewals

In November of 2010 as a lame duck legislature was preparing to vote on unseen contracts with state government employee unions, the MacIver Institute issued a plea to the public for help. We asked that anyone with access to details of the agreements, or the actual proposals, send them to us. We vowed to make them public.

“We believe the public should have an opportunity to gain a greater understanding of these agreements before they are voted on by the legislature,” Brett Healy, MacIver Institute’s President said at the time. “We’re asking anyone with access to the various proposed agreements to email them to us so that we can post them online for Wisconsin citizens to see.”

You came through, and we followed through on our promise.  Because of that partnership, the deals were no longer secretive, and the general public was better informed.

Today, as Act 10 currently sits in limbo as the result of judicial activism in Dane County, many local governments and school districts are in a rush to extend contract agreements under the old law. In many cases these agreements are being voted on with little advance notice.

We think that’s wrong, and we’re hoping that, together, we can bring some transparency to these efforts.

So, today, we turn to you again.  We’re reaching out to the teachers, school board members and school district administrators who have access to material that is not yet public, but should be.

Specifically we’re in search of two types of materials:

1)    Information regarding pending labor agreements between school districts and their employee unions

2)    Materials pertaining to unions’ membership renewal / automatic dues payment efforts

Send us what you have. After verifying authenticity, we’ll report on these efforts and post the tentative agreements online, again.

Our email address is info@MacIverInstitute.com .

The MacIver Institute is committed to greater transparency within state and local governments in Wisconsin. In the last two years MacIver has disclosed previously-secret agreements on the state budget, filed several open records requests regarding ongoing capital projects like the proposed rail line between Madison and Milwaukee, published the Statements of Economic Interest for all 132 state lawmakers online and launched the most comprehensive public salary transparency website in the state, WIOpenGov.org.

We’ll keep you posted.

Three Wisc. Democrats Attempt to Charge Thousands of Dollars for Copies of Public Records Regarding Budget Repair Bill

MacIver News Service | April 4, 2011

[Madison, Wisc…] Three Dane County Democratic lawmakers want to charge a free market think tank more than $7,500  to comply with open record requests for correspondence regarding one legislative initiative.

In a letter to several state lawmakers, dated March 24th, The MacIver Institute requested:

“Copies of all correspondence you have received or sent, (including, but not limited to, letters, emails, voice mails, records of phone calls, and logs of in-person meetings) regarding the subject of changes to Wisconsin’s collective bargaining laws for public employees. This request covers such correspondence received or sent between January 1, 2011 and March 23, 2011.”

In an email response dated March 30, Representative Mark Pocan (D-Madison) personally alleged it would take two staffers, working full time, two weeks to comply with the request.

“A quick review of our office files pertaining to collective bargaining laws for public employees, 2011 SSSB 11, 2011 SSAB 11, and 2011 Wis. Act 10 indicates that there are over 8,000 documents that would meet this search criteria,” Pocan wrote. “Our office anticipates that copying costs for this request will be a minimum of $1,500 and that fulfilling this request will require approximately 80 hours of staff time, which if pro rated for staff salaries, would cost approximately $2,600.”

Mike Murray, a member of Representative Joe Parisi (D-Madison) staff offered a similar response via email one day earlier.

“A cursory review of our office files pertaining to collective bargaining laws for public employees, 2011 SSSB 11, 2011 SSAB 11, and 2011 Wis. Act 10 indicates that there are, at a minimum, 8,000 documents that would meet this search criteria,” Murray wrote on March 29. “Our office anticipates that copying costs for this request will be a minimum of $1,500 and that fulfilling this request will require approximately 60 hours of staff time, which if pro rated for staff salaries, would cost approximately $1,750.”

While more vague, Senator Erpenbach’s staff did not quote such exorbitant fees for access to this public information.

“It will indeed cost in excess of $50,” said Julie Landrie of the Erpenbach (D-Middleton) office, who on March 28 was the first to respond to the MacIver request. “I’m making that estimation based on the fact I just fulfilled a request that had half of the content and half of the days and it was $378 to locate and an additional $20 to copy.”

Other public officials, including several state lawmakers to whom MacIver sent similar requests have yet to respond to the inquiries.

State law allows public officials to charge “the actual, necessary and direct cost” of locating records, requested under the state’s open records law. However, Brett Healy, President of the MacIver Institute, doubts locating the records would be so labor intensive.

“In this electronic age that we live in, all it would take is a simple query within their email program for the dates in question and the public information we have requested would be ready,” said Healy.  “This is not sensitive information but general constituent correspondence sent to public officials on one of the most publicly-debated issues in recent memory.”

Healy insists that if the lawmakers chose to be more accommodating, meeting this request would not be expensive.

“We would be happy to take our jump drive over to the Capitol so the electronic mail could be copied to it, no wasted paper copies, no wasted tax dollars on unnecessary staff work,” said Healy. “It is ridiculous to think that it would take 80 hours to compile less than 12 weeks of mostly electronic records regarding one piece of legislation. It is unfortunate that some public officials will go to great lengths in order to avoid handing over public records.”

Healy said his organization has made dozens of open records requests to legislators and officials from both parties in recent months and has never been met with such hefty cost estimates.

“I am puzzled as to how some of these officials know how many records are covered by this request, yet they contend it would take 60-80 hours of staff time to find and compile them,” Healy said. “By any reasonable standard, this just doesn’t pass the smell test.”

Healy said he has not made a final determination whether or not to narrow the request for information in order to lower the costs, drop the requests or pay the fees.

“The public deserves to know who was talking to whom and what was being discussed during this unprecedented debate and subsequent legal wrangling over the budget repair bill,” said Healy. “At this point, if we can raise the funds, I’m inclined to press on for access to this information.”

The MacIver News Service is a project of the MacIver Institute.

Full text of the requests sent to Senator Erpenbach and Represntatives Parisi and Pocan, made by MacIver Institute’s dommunications director, Brian Fraley:

This letter is to request the following records, under the state’s Open Records Law (19.31-39, Wisconsin Statutes):

Copies of all correspondence you have received or sent, (including, but not limited to, letters, emails, voice mails, records of phone calls, and logs of in-person meetings) regarding the subject of changes to Wisconsin’s collective bargaining laws for public employees. This request covers such correspondence received or sent between January 1, 2011 and March 23, 2011.

Included in this request are communications specifically pertaining to 2011 SSSB11, 2011 SSAB11, and 2011 Wis. Act 10 as well as the issue generally.

Please be aware that the Open Records law defines “record” to include information that is maintained on paper as well as electronically, such as data files and unprinted emails. Wis. Stat. § 19.32(2).

Please also be aware that the Open Records law “shall be construed in every instance with the presumption of complete public access consistent with the conduct of governmental business. The denial of access generally is contrary to the public interest and only in exceptional cases can access be denied.” If you deny my request, the law requires you to do so in writing and state what part of the law you believe entitles you to deny my request. Wis. Stat. § 19.35(4)(a).

The Open Records law states that you may charge for “the actual, necessary and direct cost” of locating records, if this exceeds $50, and for photocopies. The Wisconsin Department of Justice advises that copying fees under the Open Records law should be “around 15 cents per page and that anything in excess of 25 cents may be suspect.” Please advise me before processing this request if the total cost will exceed $50.  Where the documents are available electronically, they can be sent to the following address: bfraley@maciverinstitute.com.

As you know, the law requires you to respond to this request “as soon as practicable and without delay.”

If you are not the records custodian for this information, please forward this request to the appropriate person. Also, please let me know if I can clarify or refine this request.

Doyle Administration Warned Not to Destroy Public Records

MacIver News Service | November 16, 2010

[Madison, Wisc...] Top officials within the Administration of outgoing Governor Jim Doyle have been reminded not to destroy public records in their waning days in power.

Carol Hemersbach, Acting Chair for the Wisconsin Public Records Board, sent a memo to all agency secretaries, deputy secretaries and executive assistants explaining the need to maintain public documents.

“With the transition to a new Governor in January 2011 there will be many changes in appointments within Wisconsin State government,” wrote Hemersbach. “The Public Records Board would like to take this opportunity to remind state officials about the importance of proper record keeping, ensuring a smooth transition and adequate maintenance of the public records within your offices.”

The memo warns that individuals, including political appointees who will be leaving state service soon, must keep their records for their successors.

“Records created, maintained or received in the course of conducting public business belong to the office and not the individual. Wis. Stat.19.21 (2) requires public officials to make the records of their offices available to their successors. Generally, any records created or received in an official capacity are public records and not the private property of the office holder or appointee,” the memo stated. “The statutory definition of record is quite broad and the exclusion for personal property is narrowly defined as “materials which are purely the personal property of the custodian and have no relation to his or her office.”

The memo advises that when in doubt, state employees should maintain their records.

“Officials should err on the side of maintaining a complete set of records, removing only those items that meet the two-part test of this statute,” Hemersbach wrote.

Click here to see the entire memo.

Citizens’ Guide to High Speed Rail Construction Debate

Part 1:  Questions You Can Ask

Currently, the Wisconsin Department of Transportation is working on convincing local governments in Southeast Wisconsin to invest local property tax dollars for the construction and maintenance of train stations along the proposed Milwaukee to Madison high speed rail line.

The DOT is promising some funds toward construction of the stations, however the Department has repeatedly avoided answering simple questions regarding the project in general, and the station construction, specifically.

The MacIver Institute has compiled a short list of simple, straightforward questions that citizens can ask their local officials as they deliberate spending scarce public resources on this project.

.

If you ask your local officials these questions, we’d appreciate you emailing any responses you receive to: info@maciverinsittute.com so that we can publish a comprehensive list of answers.

.

General Questions

  • What is the ridership projection for this line?
  • How much will the fares be?
  • Have different ridership projections been calculated based on different fares or does the state DOT believe ridership would be constant regardless of direct passenger costs?
  • How much will the state have to pay to operate the line in each of the first 10 years?
  • Who is responsible for cost overruns for the construction of the entire line?
  • Does the DOT foresee a time when passenger fares will pay the full cost of operating the line?

.

Train Station-Related Questions

  • How much would the construction of a station in this city cost?
  • How much of that construction cost would be borne by local taxpayers?
  • What impact would this have on the average property tax bill?
  • Who would sign the contract to build the station?
  • What impact would this project have on other capital projects planned by this city?
  • What impact would this project have on our city’s bond rating?
  • Has an environmental impact study been conducted similar to what any private construction project would be subject to?
  • Would the station construction project go through an open-bidding process wherein our local officials could choose the lowest bidder?
  • Are there any union vendor or living wage requirements associated with this project?
  • Who would be responsible for cost overruns for station construction?
  • What are the projected annual maintenance costs this local municipality would have to bear?
  • Would there be a need for increased police protection as the result of the estimated number of passengers getting on and off the train each year?
  • Would there  be a need for increased road maintenance for the access points to the station?
  • What relevant evidence is there that this station will spur economic development here when the Sturtevant station has not?

See Part Two of our Citizens Guide to ‘High Speed’ Rail Construction Debate.

Governor, DOT Yet to Turn Over Records Regarding Oconomowoc Station Decision

[Madison, Wisc...] Wisconsin Governor Jim Doyle and the State’s Department of Transportation have yet to respond to a simple and straightforward open records request regarding the so-called Milwaukee to Madison high speed rail line. The John K. MacIver Institute for Public Policy is investigating the events surrounding the abrupt cancellation of the Oconomowoc train station.

Last month, DOT officials notified the City of Oconomowoc that their city was no longer being considered for a stop on the controversial passenger rail line.  On August 19th, MacIver filed formal records requests with Governor Doyle and Secretary of Transportation Frank Busalacchi.

“Officials in Oconomowoc began asking legitimate questions regarding the costs local taxpayers would incur to construct and maintain a train station and rather than answer those questions, the State scraps the planned station altogether,” said Brett Healy, President of the MacIver Institute. “We want to know why and there is no excuse to deny these simple requests for the truth.”

MacIver filed identical open records requests with Doyle and Busalacchi two weeks ago. Both requests were sent via US Mail. The request of Governor Doyle was also hand-delivered and Busalacchi’s was also faxed to his office.

The requests read, in part:

On behalf of the John K. MacIver Institute for Public Policy this is a formal request for the following records, under the state’s Open Records Law (Wis. Stats. 19.31-39):

Copies and records of all communications from July 1, 2010 to August 19, 2010 which include you or members of your staff regarding the Oconomowoc stop on the Milwaukee to Madison rail line

This request includes, but is not limited too, documents, emails and records of phone calls (from you and members of your staff) regarding the logistics, design, development and approval of a train station in Oconomowoc.

“Local government officials, and the taxpayers they represent, have a right to ask legitimate questions regarding an expensive federal and state project that will also require significant local tax expenditures,” said Healy. “There are a lot of questions surrounding this project and DOT and the Governor’s office should quit stonewalling and provide some answers.”

Letter to Governor Doyle
Letter to Secretary Busalacchi

MacIver Institute Files Open Records Requests Regarding Oconomowoc Train Station

Free Market Think Tank Pursues Communications from Governor’s Office and DOT

[Madison, Wisc..] The John K. MacIver Institute for Public Policy is investigating the events surrounding the abrupt alterations in the Milwaukee to Madison rail project.

On Tuesday, DOT officials notified the City of Oconomowoc that their city was no longer being considered for a stop on the controversial passenger rail line.

“Officials in Oconomowoc began asking legitimate questions regarding the costs local taxpayers would incur to construct and maintain a train station and rather than answer those questions, the State scraps the planned station altogether,” said Brett Healy, President of the MacIver Institute. “We’re now looking for answers as to how this all developed.”

MacIver filed identical open records requests with Governor Doyle and Department of Transportation Secretary Frank Busalacchi.  The requests read, in part:

On behalf of the John K. MacIver Institute for Public Policy this is a formal request for the following records, under the state’s Open Records Law (Wis. Stats. 19.31-39):

Copies and records of all communications from July 1, 2010 to August 19, 2010 which include you or members of your staff regarding the Oconomowoc stop on the Milwaukee to Madison rail line

This request includes, but is not limited too, documents, emails and records of phone calls (from you and members of your staff) regarding the logistics, design, development and approval of a train station in Oconomowoc.

“Local government officials, and the taxpayers they represent, have a right to ask legitimate questions regarding an expensive federal and state project that will also require significant local tax expenditures,” said Healy. “The MacIver Institute hopes these open record requests will help shed some light on the decision making process that led to this dramatic change of course.”

Letter to Governor Doyle Letter to Secretary Busalacchi

Trouble Brewing in Iowa County

MacIver News Service -A $6.5 million building project in Iowa County has residents up in arms, but the County Board leaders say they arre too late to do anything about it.

The Board approved a new Health and Human Services building back in October. Board members who support the project say it’s been in the works for years.

“We had to discuss it back in July or August, full board meeting, to decide to go ahead and rebid it. No one came the following month to say we really shouldn’t, or knew that the bids would be reopened in September and that we were going to be voting on it in October. No one came until we passed it to go ahead and build it,” said Eric Anderson, County Board Supervisor.

One County Board Supervisor who opposes the project, John Meyers, says the board used illegal procedures to pass the project. He and others filed a lawsuit against the county.

While a judge dismissed the case, but has not yet filed a formal order. When the county told a bond company there was no pending litigation against the project, Meyers says it lied.

“The judge has not yet filed his final statement on that, and there’s still time for us to file an appeal. None of that’s been completed, and corporate counsel represented that everything was complete,” Meyers said.

Additionally, a petition collected two thousand signatures calling for a referendum. The county board said the petition was not done properly and the project has already been approved.

However, there will still be a referendum of sorts on the project next week, when voters go to the polls to vote for candidates for the Iowa County Board of Supervisors.

MacIver’s Bill Osmulski has more details and filed this report from Iowa County:

 

Liberals Fishing for Dirt on Vukmir

The Wisconsin Open Records Law and the Federal Freedom of Information Act are powerful tools for reporters and the general public who believe the government that serves them should be more transparent.

Just this month, journalists’ open records requests have provided valuable insight into the means, methods and motivations of some prominent Wisconsin lawmakers.

1) When veteran Democratic Lawmaker Marlin Schneider (D-Wisconsin Rapids) was pushing his bill to restrict public access to public court information, he sent a memo to his Capitol colleagues Dec. 23 seeking co-sponsors wherein he claimed (as he later would at a public hearing) that he had received “hundreds” of letters from innocent people who said their lives had been hurt by information appearing on the state’s Web site for court records. The Associated Press filed an open records request seeking copies of all the contacts Schneider had received and records showed that only 59 people had sent e-mails or letters to Schneider on the issue in the last three years. Worse yet for Representative Schneider, only 22 of those people complained that records on CCAP had hurt them even though their charges had been dismissed. Not hundreds.

2) After Assembly Speaker Mike Sheridan (D-Janesville) was caught up in a publicly embarassing intra-party squabble over his personal relationship with a female lobbyist, an open records request revealed information that showed how his consitutents and others communicated their opinion on the matter.

On the opoosite end of the spectrum are taxpayer-financed, time-wasting requests that serve as nothing more than free political opposition research fishing expeditions conducted at taxpayers’ expense. With these requests, one can draw more insight about the means, methods and motivations of the person making the request. Consider this recent request filed with the office of State Representative Leah Vukmir (R-Wauwatosa) by former One Wisconsin Now minion and current blogger Cory Liebmann:

Please be advised that I am requesting the following public records of Rep. Leah Vukmir’s office under the state’s open records law:

1.  All email from 7/1/08 through 1/20/10 for Rep. Vukmir, Dean Cady and Matthew Adamczyk (only in his capacity working for Rep. Vukmir) that fit the following search words and names:

“Jim Sullivan”, “Sullivan”, “WPRI”, “Wisconsin Policy Research Institute”, “MacIver”, “Americans for Prosperity”, “AFP”, “Sykes”, “Belling”, “Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce”, “WMC”, “Grebe”, “Kohler”, “Bradley Foundation”, “Obama”, “Palin”, “McCain”, “ALEC”, “American Legislative Exchange Council”, “Republican”, “Democrat”, “GOP”, “Barrett”, “Scott Walker”, “Lawton”, “Healy”, “Jensen”, “Zignego”, “Walton”, “Wal-Mart”, “Sprenger”, “Wisconsin Right to Life”, “WRTL” , “Pro-Life Wisconsin”, “Tenth Amendment”, “Tea Party”, “Wisconsin Family Council”, “WFC”, “Wisconsin Family Action”, “WFA”, “Appling”, “Julaine”, “Milwaukee Police”, “Grothman”, “Ed Thompson”, “WVCY”, “global warming”, “marijuana”, “PRESS”, “Parents Raising Educational Standards in Schools”, “Rose Fernandez”, “Fraley”, “Mark Block”, “Dooley”, “Real Debate”, “Owen”, “Wigderson”, “McBride”, “Bucher”, “Boots and Sabers”, “Lightbourn”, “Sheehy”, “Koschnick”, “Memphis”, “Luber”, “Stitt”, “One Wisconsin Now”, “Citizen Action”.

2. All official calendar entries (including notes) for Rep. Vukmir and Dean Cady from 7/1/08 through 1/20/10 with known representatives or employees from any of the following entities and organizations:

Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce, Americans for Prosperity, MacIver Institute, Wisconsin Policy Research Institute, American Legislative Exchange Council, Wisconsin Right to Life, Pro-Life Wisconsin, Wisconsin Family Council, Wisconsin Family Action, Wisconsin Business Council, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Wisconsin State Journal, Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce, FreedomWorks,  Bradley Foundation,  Wisconsin Coalition of Virtual School Families, Parents Raising Educational Standards in Schools, School Choice Wisconsin, Milwaukee Police Association.

3. A listing of Rep. Vukmir’s use of sick, vacation and other paid leave while she has been in her current office.

4. A copy of any electronic files that have been compiled tracking media clips involving Rep. Vukmir during her time in her current office. 

Vukmir’s office staff  say they will comply with this request, even though a nonpartisan legislative attorney said the request could be denied for being too broad in scope.  

Representative Vukmir is running for State Senate this fall, challenging Democrat Senator Jim Sullivan (D-Wauwatosa). It is clear from this request that the liberal special interest machine is ready to portray Vukmir as part of some grand conservative cabal.  If only Mr. Liebmann had asked for the minutes of the latest Vast Right Wing Conspiracy Annual Meeting, he could have received all his research in one handy document.

As a constituent, and through my professional work, I would not be surprised if there are a few communications between me and the Representative. As I am sure there are reams of communications that mention “Democrat’ and “Republican.” I find it particularly amusing that Mr. Liebmann is so concerned about “Tenth Amendment.” Who knew that state’s rights would be so controversial?

As a rule, when I’ve filed such requests, they are much more narrow in scope and much easier with which to compy. As the liberal special interest groups begin to use the information obtained by requests like this, I hope Mr. Liebmann makes a tidy sum for the work done by state employees who complied with his fishing expedition/request.

Kudos to Representative Vukmir for fulfilling the request and for having nothing to fear from such transparency.

And finally, here’s hoping Mr. Liebmann doesn’t dent his tin foil hat when lugging all those documents out of the Capitol.

By Brian Fraley
A MacIver Perspective


MacIver on facebook @MacIverWisc on twitter MacIver Youtube channel subscribe