Posts Tagged ‘Regulations’

Vice President Touts Free Market, Huge New Regulations

MacIver News Service - [Milwaukee, Wisc..] During his visit to Milwaukee this week, Vice President Joe Biden spoke at length about the strengths of a free market economy. He then went on to explain how sweeping, new, government regulation would ensure a free market economy.

Congresswoman Gwen Moore (D-Wis 4th) and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner didn’t seem to share his fondness for free markets. They want the power to regulate bank lending and to takeover and terminate failing firms, with Moore proudly touting the ability for Washington to “kill these huge failing banks.”

See more in this video report:

 

Critics Warn PSC Global Warming Bill Analysis Flawed

Commission had said proposal would actually lower costs to consumers

MNS [Madison, Wisc…] The Public Service Commission’s analysis of a controversial environmental bill was based on a “serious methodological error, that distorts the actual cost impact of the bill” according to the Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce (MMAC).

MMAC sent a letter to Senator Jeff Plale, co-Chair of the Senate Select Committee on Clean Energy Jobs, in which they outline their concerns.

“As you can see, the results, using PSC’s own study numbers, indicate that the CEJA Sub proposal would increase electric rates between 6.4% and 12.5% above the status quo, depending on the assumption made for CO2 regulation costs,” MMAC warned. “This would be an improvement from the original proposed bill, in which rates would increase between 7.8% and 20.8%, but it would still be a significant increase above the status quo.” 

MMAC’s revelation comes on the heels of continuing criticism that the Public Service Commission has become advocates for the legislation, rather than impartial, nonpartisan regulators.

“We are extremely concerned that these increased rate costs would have a dampening effect on the economy as electricity would cost more for everyone.  Those concerns are heightened further in light of  the current challenging economic climate,” said Steve Baas, MMAC’s director of Government Affairs in the letter to Plale.

The legislation, dubbed the ‘Clean Energy Jobs Act’ by its supporters, is scheduled for a vote in the State Assembly later Tuesday.

Attempts to reach Senator Plale for comment this morning were unsuccessful.

See the letter, here.

Republicans Contend Utility Regulators are Acting as Advocates

MNS- [Madison, Wisc ] Wisconsin Republicans claim Public Service Commission Chair Eric Callisto has crossed the line from regulator to that of advocate. They say the PSC’s analysis of the current global warming bill ignores the legislation’s true cost to manufacturers and homeowners and that the PSC itself has been tainted by his bias.  See more in this video report:

 

Plale Admits Doubts on Global Warming, Still Pushes Bill

MacIver News Service - 

[Madison, Wisconsin] Senator Jeff Plale (D-South Milwaukee) co-Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Clean Energy made a stunning comment about the threat of Global Warming, just as his meeting concluded, Thursday.

Plale informed his fellow Senators that the final bill, SB 450-dubbed by supporters as “The Clean Energy Jobs Act,” will undergo revisions as the legislative process continues. Plale told his colleagues and others in attendance “Now is the time to take the information we’ve gathered, start to put something together that is work that’s workable.”

Plale then stunned the audience with this admission about his position on the global warming debate: “I don’t know if the science is real or not.”

Yet, he argued, something needed to be done.

How sweeping that ’something’ will be, is yet to be determined. 

Right now, according to the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau, SB 450 relates to:

“goals for reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, for construction of zero net energy buildings and for energy conservation; information, analyses, reports, education, and training concerning greenhouse gas emissions and climate change; energy efficiency and renewable resource programs; renewable energy requirements of electric utilities and retail cooperatives; requiring electric utilities to purchase renewable energy from certain renewable facilities in their service territories; authority of the Public Service Commission over nuclear power plants; motor vehicle emission limitations; a low carbon standard for transportation fuels; the brownfield site assessment grant program, the main street program, the brownfields grant program, the forward innovation fund, grants to local governments for planning activities, the transportation facilities economic assistance and development program, a model parking ordinance; surface transportation planning by the Department of Transportation and metropolitan planning organizations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; environmental evaluations for transportation projects; idling limits for certain vehicles; energy conservation codes for public buildings, places of employment, one- and two-family dwellings, and agricultural facilities; design standards for state buildings; energy efficiency standards for certain consumer audio and video devices, boiler inspection requirements; greenhouse gas emissions and energy use by certain state agencies and state assistance to school districts in achieving energy efficiencies; creating an exception to local levy limits for amounts spent on energy efficiency measures; creating an energy crop reserve program; identification of private forest land, promoting sequestration of carbon in forests, qualifying practices and cost-share requirements under the forest grant program established by the Department of Natural Resources; air pollution permits for certain stationary sources reducing greenhouse gas emissions; allocating a portion of existing tax-exempt industrial development revenue bonding to clean energy manufacturing facilities and renewable power generating facilities; requiring a report on certain programs to limit greenhouse gas emissions; granting rule-making authority; requiring the exercise of rule-making authority; and providing a penalty.”

  • Print
  • Email This Post Email This Post
  • Share

Recent Posts


MacIver on facebook @MacIverWisc on twitter MacIver Youtube channel subscribe