Posts Tagged ‘Tea Party’

Stunner: Walker Recall Petitions NOT Available for Online Review

MacIver News Service | January 30, 2012

[Madison, Wisc…] The Wisconsin Government Accountability Board has not posted scanned copies of the Governor Walker recall petitions online despite promises to the citizens of Wisconsin that they would do so.

GAB staff delivered copies of the scans to the Governor’s campaign late last week. The campaign, with the assistance of the Republican Party of Wisconsin, began reviewing the petitions at satellite offices across the state this weekend.

Once they scanned documents, they were going to make them public, having issued an alert to all media earlier in the day. The revelation was the top of many radio broadcasts Monday.

Such a public disclosure would have allowed the volunteers at the independent VerifytheRecall.com to also begin their effort.

But early this evening the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported GAB staff was going back on their promise, citing alleged privacy concerns by some who signed the public documents.

This is the latest development in a series of back and forth decisions by the GAB that promises more legal challenges ahead.

And it could thwart a massive effort by Tea Party groups to conduct an independent review of the petitions.

“Never before have regular citizens organized in this way to this scale in a nonpartisan sense to uphold the integrity of Wisconsin’s elections,” said Ross Brown,  Founder and President of the Tea Party Group, We the People of the Republic and co-organizer of the Verify The Recall effort before the GAB’s surprise announcement was made. “Our volunteers are anxious to start and committed to the effort.”

Brown said approximately 87 percent of the more than 11,000 volunteers who signed up at his website are from Wisconsin, although they do have volunteers from all but one of the 50 states.

“Verify the Recall has written a new play in the citizens’ playbook as to how we can preserve our clean and honest elections,” Brown said.

With Monday night’s revelation that the GAB was refusing to comply with their earlier public pronouncements, the Verify the Recall process could be in jeopardy.

As previously reported, the GAB had originally intended to only provide a cursory review of the signatures, having interpreted the statutes to put more of the verification onus on the recall targets. They had no intention of putting the signatures online.

In the days after the Senate petitions were placed online, social media sites and talk radio were filled with claims of problems with the petitions.

In late December, Assembly Speaker Jeff Fitzgerald (R-Horicon) received a memo from the nonpartisan Legislative Council, which explained the GAB was proactively choosing not to create a database and was not prohibited from doing so.

“The statutes do not impose explicit barriers to the creation of a GAB database that contains the names and addresses of individuals who sign recall petitions or to public availability of the database,” said Katie Bender-Olson, Staff Attorney with the Wisconsin Legislative Council in a memo to the Speaker “To the contrary, the statute enumerating the powers and duties of GAB may support the agency’s authority to create a recall signature database and make it accessible to the public.”

“The A in GAB stands for accountability,” said Speaker Fitzgerald at the time “I would hope this memo encourages them to provide the public with a nonpartisan source of important data that could help root out possible duplicate signatures and fraud.”

The memo continued, “There do not appear to be any specific statutory obstacles to the creation or availability of such a database,” Bender-Olson wrote. “Further, the GAB itself appears to believe that the creation of a recall signature database and the public availability of recall petition signature information are permissible.”

State Republican Party of Wisconsin Executive Director Stephan Thompson had earlier filed suit against the GAB requiring more aggressive verification procedures by the GAB. Waukesha Circuit Court Judge Mac Davis ruled this month that the GAB needed to check for duplicates and obvious fake names.

In the wake of Judge Davis’ ruling, and negative publicity surrounding their own comments regarding the potential validity of signatures of Mickey Mouse and Hitler, the GAB decided to scan the petitions, begin a more vigorous review and place the scanned copies of all petitions online.

On Monday morning they announced the signatures would be available later in the day. As the day went on, the information remained absent from their website.

In addition to the recruiting volunteers to data enter signatures, Brown’s group created a ‘no sign’ list, for which individuals could sign up to be notified if their names fraudulently appeared on the Walker recall petitions.

“Over 50,000 Wisconsinites have protected their name and address against fraudulent petition use by signing up for our “No Sign Registration List,” Brown told MacIver News Service.  “Individuals have also submitted the names of their deceased family members and underage children on this list. Verify the Recall will notify anyone who signs up for this list if their name and/or address is found anywhere on a recall petition.”

Without access to the petitions to create a searchable database, the ‘No sign’ list project would also not be able to be completed.

The MacIver News Service will have more on this story as it develops.

___

Recall petitions were to be posted online at the GAB Website.

Verify the Recall, the project of We The People of the Republic and the Wisconsin Grandsons of Liberty can be found online here.

Tea Party Groups Vow to Verify Recall Signatures

MacIver News Service | December 5, 2011

[Madison, Wisc…] We the People of the Republic and The Wisconsin Grandsons of Liberty, two of Wisconsin’s most prominent ‘Tea Party’ groups, are organizing an effort to check the validity of all signatures submitted in the ongoing gubernatorial recall.

The project is taking place, online, at VerifyTheRecall.com

“Software has been developed that will help identify duplicate signatures and other signature irregularities (questionable addresses, etc.),” wrote Ross Brown of We the People of the Republic in an email to supporters. “Additionally, individuals will be able to look up their name and address on a website to see if they have been included as a petition signor.”

Last week, the MacIver News Service reported that despite requesting a supplemental budget appropriation in excess of $600,000, the Wisconsin Government Accountability Board would not be checking the authenticity or validity of the more than 540,000 recall petitions.

“We have all been hearing reports of duplicate signatures, questionable practices, and downright fraud in the gubernatorial recall effort,” reads the introductory posting on the VerifyTheRecall website. “In the last few weeks, there has been a public outcry to build a system to check the submitted signatures after learning that the Government Accountability Board (GAB) will assume all signatures are valid unless challenged as otherwise.”

Ross said the effort is all about Wisconsin voters making sure their elections are clean and fair.

“By taking such efforts, we will be able to protect the integrity of Wisconsin’s elections by ensuring that only legitimate Wisconsin electors are counted – once - as signors of petitions,” Brown wrote.

Ross notes the project is undertaken in an effort to ensure the integrity of Wisconsin’s elections and associated processes. The project, which also has a page on facebook, is an independent, non-partisan effort and is not affiliated withany candidate or public official, or with any campaign.

Volunteers will not be able to start entering data into the database until the gubernatorial recall drive is finished and the data is publicly available from the GAB, which could take months.

Ross stressed that the Verify the Recall project does not endorse or oppose any public officials or candidates for public office. We the People of the Republic and The Wisconsin Grandsons of Liberty are 501(c)4 non-profit organizations.

Obamacare Declared Unconstitutional

Legal Community Debates Impact of Individual Mandate

MacIver News Service | January 31. 2011

[Madison, Wisc…] A second federal judge has ruled the recent sweeping federal health insurance reform bill unconstitutional.

READ THE DECISION

In his decision, U.S. District Judge Roger Vinson focused on the law’s “individual mandate,” which required Americans purchase health insurance or face a penalty.

“This has been a difficult decision to reach, and I am aware that it will have indeterminable implications,” Vinson wrote. “Because the individual mandate is unconstitutional and not severable, the entire act must be declared void.”

Officially dubbed the the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the bill is commonly referred to as Obamacare–after the President who exerted a great deal of political capital to get the law passed last year.

Regardless of what side people take on the individual mandate in the new Federal Health Care Law, everyone agrees there is a great deal at stake in the lawsuits filed by 28 states (and assorted interested parties).

The Federalist Society in Madison recently invited supporters and critics of the mandate discuss the issue.

Representative Jon Richards (D-Milwaukee) argued for it. Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen and Illya Somin, George Mason University Associate Professor of Law, argued against it.

The national debate has centered around the interstate commerce clause in the US Constitution, which authorizes Congress to regulate commerce between the states. Arguments surrounding that clause also dominated the debate at the luncheon last week.

Activity Versus Inactivity

Opponents of the mandate argue commerce is an activity. If you do not something that is inactivity, they say. The constitution does not regulate inactivity, and therefore, the commerce clause cannot force one to buy health insurance.

Supporters say that is a technicality. As Richards explained it, the point is a “technical legal conception that conservative members of Congress brought to the attention of the court.”

To Richards the mandate is more about ensuring people do not freeload off of the system, only buying insurance once they need it.

Most Health Insurance Markets Do Not Cross State Lines

Opponents of the mandate point out that even when an individual chooses to buy health insurance, rarely can one purchase  it across state lines. That means it does not qualify as “interstate” commerce.

Economic decisions and their impact

Supporters of the mandate say the commerce clause applies to economic decisions that have an economic effect. If one does not buy health insurance, that decision will effect the price of insurance for those that do.

Opponents of the mandate are terrified by that kind of logic.

“The problem with this kind of argument is this can apply to any decision anyone makes of any kind,” said Somin.

Health Care is Special?

Supporters of the mandate state health care is the only service/product a seller is required by law to provide you whether you can pay for it or not. Health care is also something everyone will require at some point in their lives.

Opponents argue this is confusing the issues of health care and health care insurance. Not everyone will need insurance to pay for their health care, and therefore everyone will not use health insurance at some point in their lives. Furthermore, this would be an example of the government imposing regulation on an individual for something they may or may not do voluntarily in the future.

In his decision, Judge Vinson took aim at the individual mandate and rejected arguments that health care is an extraordinary issue.

“It would be a radical departure from existing case law to hold that Congress can regulate inactivity under the Commerce Clause,” Vinson wrote. “If it has the power to compel an otherwise passive individual into a commercial transaction with a third party merely by asserting — as was done in the Act — that compelling the actual transaction is itself “commercial and economic in nature, and substantially affects interstate commerce” [see Act § 1501(a)(1)], it is not hyperbolizing to suggest that Congress could do almost anything it wanted.”

Perhaps in a nod to the ‘Tea Party’ movement that galvanized opposition to the measure, Vinson makes an overt reference to one of the tax revolts that led to the American Revolution.

“It is difficult to imagine that a nation which began, at least in part, as the result of opposition to a British mandate giving the East India Company a monopoly and imposing a nominal tax on all tea sold in America would have set out to create a government with the power to force people to buy tea in the first place,” he wrote.

The debate over the mandate extends beyond the merits of the provision itself. There are also some far reaching implications on what it could allow Congress to do in the future.

It is widely speculated that today’s decision will be appealed. If so, Wisconsin’s Attorney General vows to continue to his efforts.

“Now, we wait to see if the federal government has finally gotten the message,” Van Hollen said Monday. “If they don’t get the message, and decide to appeal the case, as they did when they lost in Virginia, my colleagues and I will continue our fight to defend the Constitution and protect the people of Wisconsin from this unconstitutional law. ”

MacIver News’ Bill Osmulski reports on some of the fears those experts at the luncheon hold regarding any legal outcome:

 

Son of a Stimulus!

Hold onto your wallets, folks.

While the public focuses their attention on the man-made disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, the man-made disaster of profligate government spending across the country is getting worse.

At the MacIver Institute, we’ve discussed the funding cliff facing many school districts across Wisconsin. We’ve also chronicled the mismanagement of the state’s finances and the reckless budgeting of the Doyle Administration and their allies in Madison. Finally, we’ve run several news and analysis pieces on the dubious stimulative affects of the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act boondoggle.

Now, all three storylines are converging into another ‘perfect storm,’ that would gouge the taxpayers, delay any economic recovery and jeopardize the entire U.S. economy.

School districts across Wisconsin have set their budgets for the next year and in many cases have moved to layoff employees, including teachers. As municipalities look at their finances, in many cases they see declining state aid. And the state, well everyone is aware that the well has run dry and that despite increased taxes and fees on individuals and businesses, we’re running a several billion-dollar deficit. There can be no doubt that governments at every level are in a bind.

There are two ways to address these shortfalls, one hard, one easy.

The hard way would be to take advantage of this crisis as a necessary opportunity to examine the role, scope and mission of each unit of government that is facing dire financial times. Such an examination would include, but would not be limited to:

  • Comparing the pay scales of their employees with any similar private sector workers
  • Looking at the benefit costs and ways in which they could be reduced
  • Prioritizing and recommitting to the core mission and determining what functions could be outsourced, privatized or outright discontinued
  • Collaborating with peer entities in the public and private sector to provide the same service at reduced cost
  • Cracking down on waste, fraud and abuse
  • Understanding that resources are limited and reducing services to meet the taxpayers ability to pay

The easy way is to receive a bailout from the federal government.

Last month Congress rejected President Obama’s request for a $24 billion bailout of state and local governments. The president’s request for $23 billion for school districts similarly has failed to gain the necessary support…so far.

Now, President Obama is turning up the heat in his quest for the nearly $50 Billion state and local government bailout. He has written Congressional leadership, imploring them to act, quickly, on this matter and has dispatched his top advisers to the talk show circuit to reinforce the plea.

The Obama Administration and the would-be benefactors of this new ‘Stimulus’ package hope to avoid the tea-party fueled outrage of the last 15 months by attaching this bailout to some non-related piece of legislation that is close to a final vote. They can not let this boondoggle be examined on its merits. The longer this sits out in the public domain for inspection, the less likely its passage becomes.

By now even the most isolated government insider understands the taxpayer revolt another Stimulus plan would cause. “Sure the first one didn’t work, but if we don’t spend $50 Billion more things are going to be real bad,” is hardly a winning sales pitch.

The state and local government bailout isn’t about saving our nation’s schools…or our roads…or keeping cops on the street. Instead, it is merely a bailout of local and state governmental bodies who refuse to break free from the stranglehold of the public employee unions whose work rules, pay and benefit levels are simply unsustainable.

Bailing out those units of government who fail to exercise fiscal discipline is not a one time act. If these school districts, cities and states are not forced to fix the problems now, they never will. They will continue to reach out the feds for more ‘one time’ money. Whether the tax dollars come from the right pocket or the left pocket, it is still your money they are after.

Many see November as an opportunity to change the spend-happy course of governments from Madison to Washington, yet the situation could be made monumentally worse in a matter of days.

The ‘Son of Stimulus’ has gone largely unreported.

Many congressmen and senators who may have to vote on the proposal don’t want you to know that yet another bailout is in the offing.

We do. Pass this on.

By Brett Healy
A MacIver Institute Perspective 

Healy is President of the John K. MacIver Institute for Public Policy, the free market voice for Wisconsin.

Stay Informed. Stay Involved.

Click here to sign up to receive updates from the Free Market Voice for Wisconsin

An Open Letter to Wisconsin Tea Partiers

April 27, 2010

Dear Tea Partier,

Thank you.

I think it is important for those of us who have been engaged in conservative public policy battles for decades to thank you and give credit where credit is due.

While your opponents try to belittle you…smear you…ridicule or ignore you, it is evident to anyone who is paying attention that your efforts are already being felt all across the state.

Despite the story line your detractors are attempting to forward through the mainstream media, it is clear that your interest in politics and policy is informed, deep and goes far beyond attending public rallies every few months.

Because of your continued engagement, legislators in Madison are receiving record levels of contacts from their constituents. Because of your continued engagement, legislative and Congressional town hall meetings across Wisconsin are packed to the brim.

Finally, let me make the following point as clearly as I can.

Because of your continued engagement, three awful pieces of legislation were derailed last week during the waning hours of the final regular floor period of the Wisconsin Legislature. 

As I wrote in the current installment of ‘That’

s Debatable,’ exchange on WisOpinion.com:

Scot, for months the left, you and the Alinsky Brigade over at OWN have been trumpeting the virtues of efforts to address global warming, the election deform bill and the creation of regional taxing authorities for transit. The governor and both houses of the Legislature are controlled by Democrats. These bills should have been a slam dunk for passage. But, thankfully, like those who attempted to foist New Coke on us a quarter century ago, your side failed. “Epic Fail,” as the kids say these days. Let me save your side the cost of conducting post-implosion focus groups. I have a two-word answer for why the Democrats caved this week: Tea Parties. You see, the growing number of people who keep showing up at events across Wisconsin are smarter, more determined and more active than you give them credit for being. They also called their legislators and encouraged others to call when the left fringe of the Democratic Party tried to choke off the remaining manufacturing jobs in the state, attempted to facilitate greater election fraud, and tried to push a pro-tax, pro-train agenda down their throats. So, thank you, tea partiers. Keep it up. It helps Wisconsin on her road to recovery and it drives Scot and his buddies crazy! Cheers to sweet TEA.

There is no doubt that the defenders of job providers like WMC were diligent in their efforts and helped focus the public debate in opposition to the global warming bill. Similarly, local election officials and established anti-tax groups helped derail the election fraud and RTA bills. But your engagement provided the extra effort that was required to win those battles. You have become the ultimate variable in the political equation in Wisconsin.

The pundits who wondered if the Tea Party movement would amount to anything more than occasional pep rallies do not have to wait until November to find out. They got their answer last week, right here in Wisconsin.

I’ve said it before and will say it again and again: Despite the left’s attempt to paint you as a bunch of toothless, Fox News-brainwashed, GED-correspondence school dropouts who dance to the tune of your Big-Oil and GOP puppet masters, I’ve found you to be informed, skeptical and frustrated at the ever-expanding cost and reach of government. You are not going away, and you are growing in numbers everyday.

I know you don’t do this for adulation or publicity. But again, thanks, and keep up the fantastic work.

Lord knows, there is a lot more to do!

Sincerely,

Brian

By Brian Fraley
A MacIver Institute Perspective



MacIver on facebook @MacIverWisc on twitter MacIver Youtube channel subscribe